The Inference Fallacy From Bernoulli to Kolmogorov
Bernoulli’s (1713) well-known Law of Large Numbers (LLN) establishes a legitimate one-way transition from mathematical probability to observed frequency. However, Bernoulli went one step further and abusively introduced the inverse proposition. Based on a careful analysis of Bernoulli’s original proof, this paper identifies this appealing, but illegitimate, inversion of LLN as a strong driver of confusion among probabilists. Indeed, during more than two centuries this “inference fallacy” hampered the emergence of rigorous mathematical foundations for the theory of probability. In particular, the confusion pertaining to the status of statistical inference was detrimental to both Laplace’s approach based on “equipossibility” and Mises’ approach based on “collectives”. Only Kolmogorov’s (1933) axiomatization made it possible to adequately frame statistical inference within probability theory. This paper argues that a key factor in Kolmogorov’s success has been his ability to overcome the inference fallacy.
|Date of creation:||Feb 2011|
|Publication status:||Published by:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: CP114/03, 42 avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Bruxelles|
Phone: +32 (0)2 650.48.64
Fax: +32 (0)2 650.41.88
Web page: http://difusion.ulb.ac.be
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Xavier De Scheemaekere & Ariane Szafarz, 2008.
"The special status of mathematical probability: a historical sketch,"
Working Papers CEB
08-017.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Xavier De Scheemaekere & Ariane Szafarz, 2009. "The Special Status of Mathematical Probability: A Historical Sketch," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/95543, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/77259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benoit Pauwels)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.