Author
Abstract
The paper aims to demonstrate and compare the different methods of graduate career tracking. The analysis illustrates advantages, disadvantages and specific features of the collected data associated with different methods. Hungary takes place in a regular EU-funded graduate career tracking program since 2010. Two types of databases form the basis of the system. The first type contains data collected via online survey at institutional level. However, this research method suffers from the low response rate which is typical for online survey. The other type is created by integrating the existing datasets of several administrative systems (i.e. Higher Educational Information System, National Health Insurance System and National Tax Office, etc.) which is allowed by the law for the purpose of supporting the process of evidence based policy. Although this database represents the full range of graduate population it is limited in terms of content coverage. On the one hand our analysis illustrates the methodologies and characteristics of two different database and introduces the possible uses of the data both for research, information or educational policy purposes in the framework of graduate career tracking. On the other hand this paper presents the possibilities and limitations of linking data from these different sources utilizing the opportunities provided by the method of probabilistic record linkage (Ivan-Sunter, 1969). Linking administrative and survey data on individual level could be considered as a potential research procedure to compensate the weaknesses of the two aforementioned data collection methods (see Davern-Thomas, 2009; Schnell, 2013). Our paper highlights the possibilities and limitations of this procedure in terms of educational research approach within the framework of Hungarian career tracking research program.
Suggested Citation
Szilvia Nyüsti & Zsuzsanna Veroszta, 2014.
"Parallel systems of graduate career tracking in Hungary,"
Proceedings of International Academic Conferences
0301527, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
Handle:
RePEc:sek:iacpro:0301527
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
- I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
- I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following
NEP Reports:
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:0301527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.