IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sef/csefwp/508.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Using Animation to Self-report Health: a Randomized Experiment with Children

Author

Listed:
  • Carla Guerriero

    (Università di Napoli Federico II and CSEF)

  • Abrines Jaume N.

    (Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.)

  • Diaz-Ordaz K.

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK a)

  • Brown K.

    (Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK)

  • Wray J.

    (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.)

  • Ashworth J.

    (Animation, Royal College of Art, London, UK.)

  • Abbiss M.

    (Animation, Royal College of Art, London, UK.)

  • Cairns J.

    (Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.)

Abstract

The Child Health Utility-9D (CHU-9D) is the only generic preference based measure specifically developed to elicit health-related quality of life directly from children aged 7 to 11 years. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of animation on a touch screen device (tablet) is a better way of collecting health status information from children aged 4 to 14 years compared to a traditional paper questionnaire. The specific research questions were firstly, do young children (4 to 7 years) find an animated questionnaire easier to understand; secondly, independent of the child’s age, is completion of an animated questionnaire easier for sick children in hospital settings; and thirdly, do children’s preferences for the different versions of the questionnaire vary by the age of the child. Using a balanced cross-over trial we administered different versions of the CHU-9D to 221 healthy children in a school setting and 217 children with health problems in a hospital setting. The study tested five versions of the CHU-9D questionnaire: paper text, tablet text, tablet image, paper image and tablet animation. Our results indicate that the majority of the youngest children aged 4-7 years found the CHU-9D questions easy to answer independent of the type of questionnaire administered. Amongst children aged 7-14 with health problems the type of questionnaire was found to influence understanding. Children aged 7 to 11 years found tablet image and animation easier compared to text questionnaires while the oldest children in hospital found text based questionnaires easier compared to image and animation. Children in all three age groups preferred animation on a tablet to other methods of assessment. Our results highlight the potential for using an Animated Preference Based Measure to the health of children as young as 4 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Guerriero & Abrines Jaume N. & Diaz-Ordaz K. & Brown K. & Wray J. & Ashworth J. & Abbiss M. & Cairns J., 2018. "Using Animation to Self-report Health: a Randomized Experiment with Children," CSEF Working Papers 508, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
  • Handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.csef.it/WP/wp508.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer & Michael Erhart & Nora Wille & Ralf Wetzel & Jennifer Nickel & Monika Bullinger, 2006. "Generic Health-Related Quality-of-Life Assessment in Children and Adolescents," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 1199-1220, December.
    2. Katherine Stevens, 2011. "Assessing the performance of a new generic measure of health-related quality of life for children and refining it for use in health state valuation," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 157-169, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanna M Charles & Deirdre M Harrington & Melanie J Davies & Charlotte L Edwardson & Trish Gorely & Danielle H Bodicoat & Kamlesh Khunti & Lauren B Sherar & Thomas Yates & Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, 2019. "Micro-costing and a cost-consequence analysis of the ‘Girls Active’ programme: A cluster randomised controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Round, Jeff, 2012. "Is a QALY still a QALY at the end of life?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 521-527.
    3. Dominic Thorrington & Ken Eames, 2015. "Measuring Health Utilities in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of the Literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Catherine Fantaguzzi & Elizabeth Allen & Alec Miners & Deborah Christie & Charles Opondo & Zia Sadique & Adam Fletcher & Richard Grieve & Chris Bonell & Russell M. Viner & Rosa Legood, 2018. "Health-related quality of life associated with bullying and aggression: a cross-sectional study in English secondary schools," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(5), pages 641-651, June.
    5. Katherine J. Stevens, 2016. "How Well Do the Generic Multi-attribute Utility Instruments Incorporate Patient and Public Views Into Their Descriptive Systems?," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, vol. 9(1), pages 5-13, February.
    6. Joanna Coast, 2019. "Assessing capability in economic evaluation: a life course approach?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(6), pages 779-784, August.
    7. Jeff Round, 2018. "Once Bitten Twice Shy: Thinking Carefully Before Adopting the EQ-5D-5L," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(6), pages 641-643, June.
    8. Clazien Bouwmans & Annemarie Kolk & Mark Oppe & Saskia Schawo & Elly Stolk & Michel Agthoven & Jan Buitelaar & LeonaHakkaart Roijen, 2014. "Validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D and the KIDSCREEN-10 in children with ADHD," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(9), pages 967-977, December.
    9. Erika Ikeda & Chris Krägeloh & Tineke Water & Erica A. Hinckson, 2016. "An Exploratory Study of Self-reported Quality of Life in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disability," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 9(1), pages 133-153, March.
    10. Juan M. Ramos-Goñi & Mark Oppe & Elly Stolk & Koonal Shah & Simone Kreimeier & Oliver Rivero-Arias & Nancy Devlin, 2020. "International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 38(7), pages 653-663, July.
    11. Karin Dam Petersen & Gang Chen & Christine Mpundu-Kaambwa & Katherine Stevens & John Brazier & Julie Ratcliffe, 2018. "Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescent Populations: An Empirical Comparison of the CHU9D and the PedsQLTM 4.0 Short Form 15," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 11(1), pages 29-37, February.
    12. Teija Nuutinen & Eva Roos & Carola Ray & Jari Villberg & Raili Välimaa & Mette Rasmussen & Bjørn Holstein & Emmanuelle Godeau & Francois Beck & Damien Léger & Jorma Tynjälä, 2014. "Computer use, sleep duration and health symptoms: a cross-sectional study of 15-year olds in three countries," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(4), pages 619-628, August.
    13. Chung-Ping Cheng & Wei-Ming Luh & Ai-Lun Yang & Chia-Ting Su & Chung-Ying Lin, 2016. "Agreement of Children and Parents Scores on Chinese Version of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0: Further Psychometric Development," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 11(3), pages 891-906, September.
    14. Julie Ratcliffe & Elisabeth Huynh & Katherine Stevens & John Brazier & Michael Sawyer & Terry Flynn, 2016. "Nothing About Us Without Us? A Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Health‐State Values for the Child Health Utility‐9D Using Profile Case Best–Worst Scaling," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(4), pages 486-496, April.
    15. Carla Guerriero & Neus Abrines Jaume & Karla Diaz-Ordaz & Katherine Loraine Brown & Jo Wray & Joan Ashworth & Matt Abbiss & John Cairns, 2020. "Using Animation to Self-Report Health: A Randomized Experiment with Children," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(2), pages 175-188, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Children health valuation; Animation; self-reported health state measure; CHU-9D;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sef:csefwp:508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cssalit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lia Ambrosio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cssalit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.