IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

(Un)naturally low?

Listed author(s):
  • Silvia Sgherri


    (DG-Research European Central Bank and International Monetary Fund)

  • Marco J. Lombardi

    (University of Florence)

Have interest rates been held “too low†in relation to the natural rate of interest? Economists have lately begun to worry that the cost of capital may have fallen below the worldwide expected return on capital, thereby causing excessive borrowing and allowing financial imbalances to build up. On the basis of a dynamic optimizing business cycle model satisfying the natural rate hypothesis, this paper provides an evaluation of natural interest rate estimates under alternative hypotheses and model specifications. To do so, particle filtering methods are employed. The idea underlying this approach is to represent the distribution of interest by a large number of random samples, or particles, evolving over time on the basis of a simulation-based updating scheme, so that new observations are incorporated in the filter as they become available. Unlike Kalman filters, particle filters do not require linearity and Gaussianity assumptions. We show that by lessening the influence of extreme noise observations via heavy-tailed innovations, the uncertainty around time-varying estimates is trimmed down even over small samples

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 with number 321.

in new window

Date of creation: 04 Jul 2006
Handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:321
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecfa:321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.