Pricing American-style Derivatives under the Heston Model Dynamics: A Fast Fourier Transformation in the Geskeâ€“Johnson Scheme
Theoretical research on option valuation tends to focus on pricing the plain-vanilla European-style derivatives. Duffie, Pan, and Singleton (Econometrica, 2000) have recently developed a general transform method to determine the value of European options for a broad class of the underlying price dynamics. Contrastingly, no universal and analytically attractive approach to pricing of American-style derivatives is yet available. When the underlying price follows simple dynamics, literature suggests using finite difference methods. Simulation methods are often applied in more complicated cases. This paper addresses the valuation of American-style derivatives when the price of an underlying asset follows the Heston model dynamics (Rev.Fin.S., 1993). The model belongs to the class of stochastic volatility models, which have been proposed in the hope of remedying the strike-price biases of the Blackâ€“Scholes formula. Option values are obtained by a variant of the Geskeâ€“Johnson scheme (JF, 1984), which has been devised in the context of the Blackâ€“Scholes model. The scheme exploits the fact that an American option is the limit of a sequence of â€œBermudanâ€ derivatives. The latter ones can be priced recursively according to a simple formula, and iterations start from valuing a corresponding European-style security. To implement the recursion, one needs to obtain the expected value of â€œBermudanâ€ prices in the joint measure of the state variables of the model. Since the joint density must be, in turn, recovered by inverting the joint characteristic function, an unmodified Geskeâ€“Johnson algorithm implies a computationally unfeasible multiple integration. To drastically reduce the cost of numerical integration, I suggest applying a kernel-smoothed bivariate fast Fourier transformation to obtain the density function. Numerical accuracy of the method is assessed by predicting option prices of the S&P 100 index options
|Date of creation:||11 Nov 2005|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://comp-econ.org/|
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-47.
- Geske, Robert & Johnson, Herb E, 1984. " The American Put Option Valued Analytically," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1511-24, December.
- Bates, David S, 1996. "Jumps and Stochastic Volatility: Exchange Rate Processes Implicit in Deutsche Mark Options," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 9(1), pages 69-107.
- Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-43.
- Cox, John C & Ingersoll, Jonathan E, Jr & Ross, Stephen A, 1985. "A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(2), pages 385-407, March.
- Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
- Chernov, Mikhail & Ghysels, Eric, 2000. "A study towards a unified approach to the joint estimation of objective and risk neutral measures for the purpose of options valuation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 407-458, June.
- Broadie, Mark & Detemple, Jerome, 1996. "American Option Valuation: New Bounds, Approximations, and a Comparison of Existing Methods," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 9(4), pages 1211-50.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf5:187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.