Limited dependent panel data models: a comparative analysis of classical and Bayesian inference among econometric packages
Advances in computing power allow the empirical researcher to use intensive computional techniques to solve and estimate nonlinear panel-data models, specifically those arising from nonlinear panel data such as Probit and Tobit models. In these cases, maximum-likelihood estimation can be cumbersome if not analytically intractable, requiring a T-variate multiple integration whose numerical approximation can sometimes be very poor. Different solutions are offered based variously on integral approximation through simulation, some form of Generalized Method of Moments (GMM), or Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. This paper compares the outcomes of those methods available in standard econometric packages, providing illustrations among prepackaged algorithms and a MCMC Gibbs sampler for nonlinear panel data. Using Chib (1992) and Chib and Carlin (1999), I derive a sampler for Probit/Tobit panel data and provide easy-to-use software for implementing the Gibbs sampler in panel data with discrete/limited dependent variable. I show that, when dealing with a large dataset, MCMC methods may replace the procedures provided in standard econometric packages
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||11 Aug 2004|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://comp-econ.org/|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf4:41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.