IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/08-524.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The effect of project schedule adherence and rework on the duration forecast accuracy of earned value metrics

Author

Listed:
  • M. VANHOUCKE

Abstract

Earned Value Management (EVM) in project management integrates cost, schedule and technical performance and allows the calculation of cost and schedule variances, performance indices and forecasts of project cost and schedule duration. The earned value method provides early indicators of project performance to reveal opportunities and/or highlight the need for eventual corrective actions. The introduction of the earned schedule (ES) method in 2003 has led to an increasing attention on the forecast accuracy of EVM to predict a project's final duration. Previous research has shown that the ES method outperforms the more traditional predictive metrics for project duration forecasting. In this paper we critically review and test a novel ES extension, the p-factor approach, to measure schedule adherence based on the traditional earned value metrics. A large set of fictive project networks has been constructed under a controlled design and performance is measured by means of Monte Carlo simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Vanhoucke, 2008. "The effect of project schedule adherence and rework on the duration forecast accuracy of earned value metrics," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/524, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:08/524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_08_524.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vanhoucke, Mario, 2010. "Using activity sensitivity and network topology information to monitor project time performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 359-370, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:08/524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Verhaeghe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.