IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

An Exploratory Economic Analysis of Underground Pumped-Storage Hydro Power Plants in Abandoned Coal Mines

Listed author(s):
  • Madlener, Reinhard


    (E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN))

  • Specht, Jan Martin


    (RWTH Aachen University)

In Germany, the mitigation of CO2 emissions as well as the nuclear power phase-out are important political goals in the course of the sustainable energy transformation process (so-called “Energiewende”). The reduction in fossil- and nuclear-based energy supply has to be compensated by new renewable energies, especially wind power and photovoltaics. Most of the existing studies find that such an increasing contribution from volatile renewables calls for an intensified use of massive energy storage [1]. Conventional technologies for this purpose are pumped-storage hydro power (PSHP) facilities. Typically, these require a storage reservoir on top of a mountain and another one at the bottom. In Germany, unfortunately, suitable sites are quite rare and the constructional measures often have a negative impact on the landscape and the ecosphere, which often induces public resistance. A possible future solution might be the use of underground PSHP (UPSHP) plants, for example, in closed-down mines. This study constitutes an early attempt to model such plants, in order to assess and better understand the economic viability of such underground UPSHP power plants in closed down coal mines. First, we examine the topic from a technical perspective, which is followed by an economic analysis. In the technical assessment, we analyze the feasibility of building an underground reservoir, installing the pressure pipes in the main shaft and equipping the machine cavern with turbines and pumps. In the economic examination, the expected costs for building a UPSHP are calculated. A rough comparison between the costs of a classic and a UPSHP plant is made that also includes the costs of redesigning and reconstructing the underground reservoir. Based on the techno-economic evaluation, we conclude that under favorable conditions the realization of UPSHP plants seems both technically feasible and economically reasonable. More specifically, an extension of a tube system seems the most promising option. We also find that a PSHP plant in a mine shaft is probably slightly more expensive than a conventional one, an outcome that depends strongly on the feasible head. Also, the significant reduction of the adverse impacts on the landscape and local residents could be an advantage. In addition, the number of potential sites might be quite large compared to those for conventional PSHP plants.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN) in its series FCN Working Papers with number 2/2013.

in new window

Length: 34 pages
Date of creation: Feb 2013
Handle: RePEc:ris:fcnwpa:2013_002
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:fcnwpa:2013_002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Hendrik Schmitz)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.