IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Language in the Labor Market: The Immigrant Experience in Canada and the United States

Listed author(s):
  • Barry R. Chiswick
  • Paul W. Miller

This paper explores the determinants and labor market consequences for immigrants of proficiency in speaking the dominate language (English in the US, English or French in Canada). The statistical analysis is for adult men using the self-reported data, including data on language skills, available in the 1980 and 1981 censuses of the US and Canada, respectively. Fluency in the dominant language in the two countries is shown to vary systematically with the immigrant's skills, demographic characteristics, country of origin and economic incentive. That is, fluency is greater the younger the age at immigration, the greater the pre-immigration exposure to the dominant language, the longer the duration in the destination, the higher the level of schooling , and if the person immigrated unmarried, currently has children and lives in an area where few speak his native (non-dominant) language, among other variables. It is also shown that those who can expect to receive greater economic rewards from a higher level of language proficiency are more likely to make the investment and become more proficient. The determinants of earnings among immigrants are shown to be remarkably similar in the two countries; it is as if there is one earning determination process. Fluency in the dominant language has a large positive effect on earnings, independent of other personal characteristics and country of origin. The study shows the importance of explicitly incorporating dominate language fluency, and the determinates of dominant language fluency, in the criteria for allocating immigrant visas, if immigrant economic success is a policy objective. Canadian immigration policy has made more progress in this regards than U.S policy. Furthermore, this study shows that, because of the questions asked and the coding procedures, the data related to language in the U.S. census are superior to the data available in the Canadian census for both statistical and public policy analysis.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: First version 1990
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Queen's University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 784.

in new window

Date of creation: Jul 1990
Handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:784
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6

Phone: (613) 533-2250
Fax: (613) 533-6668
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:wpaper:784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Babcock)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.