Disseminating Scholarly Output: A Comment
If imitation is the sincerest flattery, then count us among the most flattered. In a recent issue of this Journal, Professor Michael Szenberg provides a number of arguments in support of eliminating the so-called "equitable ban" on authors' submitting manuscripts simultaneously to more than one journal. We found his arguments compelling, not the least because we made most of them more than a decade ago in The American Economist (1982), a journal edited-then and now-by the very same Professor Szenberg. We now elaborate the nature of that flattery and related ethics, although space prevents a comprehensive review of the parallel nature of our papers.
|Date of creation:||23 Nov 1994|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 1.55(1996): pp. 113-115|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Koch, James & Cebula, Richard, 1981. "The Curious Case of the Journal Manuscript Market: Ethics Versus Efficiency in Academe," MPRA Paper 51991, University Library of Munich, Germany.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:53571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.