IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/53571.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Disseminating Scholarly Output: A Comment

Author

Listed:
  • Cebula, Richard
  • Koch, James

Abstract

If imitation is the sincerest flattery, then count us among the most flattered. In a recent issue of this Journal, Professor Michael Szenberg provides a number of arguments in support of eliminating the so-called "equitable ban" on authors' submitting manuscripts simultaneously to more than one journal. We found his arguments compelling, not the least because we made most of them more than a decade ago in The American Economist (1982), a journal edited-then and now-by the very same Professor Szenberg. We now elaborate the nature of that flattery and related ethics, although space prevents a comprehensive review of the parallel nature of our papers.

Suggested Citation

  • Cebula, Richard & Koch, James, 1994. "Disseminating Scholarly Output: A Comment," MPRA Paper 53571, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:53571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/53571/1/MPRA_paper_53571.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James V. Koch & Richard J. Cebula, 1982. "The Curious Case of the Journal Manuscript Market: Ethics versus Efficiency in Academe," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 26(1), pages 30-34, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ethics in research; teaching economics; research protocols;

    JEL classification:

    • A20 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - General
    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:53571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.