IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/37804.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Should we design extended or straightforward questions for small stock when records are unavailable?

Author

Listed:
  • Mailu, S.K.
  • Wanyoike, M.M
  • Serem, J.K.
  • Mwanza, R.N.
  • Borter, D.K
  • Gachuiri, C.K.
  • Gathumbi, P.K.
  • Kiarie, N.
  • Lwoyero, J.

Abstract

Data from two closely related questions in a survey on rabbits is analyzed in order to determine whether results from these two groups of questions would yield similar results about numbers of rabbits kept by a household. One question seeks a straightforward answer about numbers of rabbits kept while the other group of questions breaks the question into several questions seeking numbers of rabbits disaggregated by sex and age. This is prompted by the fact that record keeping is not a very common undertaking in a small holder agricultural setting in Kenya and that in their absence, farmers may not recall precisely how many rabbits they own unless a headcount is performed. A paired sample t test is implemented to detect any significant under-reporting of rabbit numbers based on numbers from the straightforward question which we hypothesize would yield numbers far less than what is on the farm. The results show that such under-reporting is not serious enough. The conclusion is that between the two question modes implemented in the survey, the straightforward question is suitable as it is time saving when the survey data required does not include numbers disaggregated by sex or age of rabbits.

Suggested Citation

  • Mailu, S.K. & Wanyoike, M.M & Serem, J.K. & Mwanza, R.N. & Borter, D.K & Gachuiri, C.K. & Gathumbi, P.K. & Kiarie, N. & Lwoyero, J., 2012. "Should we design extended or straightforward questions for small stock when records are unavailable?," MPRA Paper 37804, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:37804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37804/1/MPRA_paper_37804.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    LSMS; Under-reporting;

    JEL classification:

    • N57 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - Africa; Oceania
    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
    • R29 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:37804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.