IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Examining Farmer Suicides in India: A Study of Literature

  • Mukherjee, Sanchita
Registered author(s):

    Farmer’s suicides are not a phenomenon by itself; rather it is an extreme manifestation of the underlying agrarian crisis prevailing within the country for a long period of time. In recent time period this menace has turned out to be an epidemic, which has rocked the whole country. According to official records, around 160,000 farmers have committed suicide since 1997 (Vandana Shiva, 2008). These numbers are enough to pass a chill down the spine! Given these facts, this paper tries to trace out the major factors leading to such rural devastation on basis of the literatures available. According to literatures most affected states are: Maharashtra (Vidharbha), Andhra Pradesh (Telengana, Warrangal, Rayalaseema, etc), Karnataka (Northern Karnataka), Kerala (Wayanad) and Chhattisgarh. The reasons cited by the literatures highlights rural indebtedness as one of the major factor. Policies associated with the process of liberalisation imposed stress on peasantry of the country by withdrawing formal supports towards the sector, which in turn made farmers dependent on non-institutional sources such as private moneylenders and private agents. Seed sector liberalisation has not only brought private players in agriculture but also encouraged monoculture of hybrid cash crops requiring costly inputs, which eventually gets transformed into debt. This situation coupled with crop failure due to pest attack, climatic change and lack of irrigation led to mismatched expectation of farmers and indebtedness. Agonised farmers found solution to all these woes in the forbidden path of committing suicide.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/35675/1/MPRA_paper_35675.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 35675.

    as
    in new window

    Length:
    Date of creation: Feb 2009
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:35675
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
    Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2219
    Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-3900
    Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:35675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.