Monetary and fiscal policy should be merged, which in turn changes the role of central banks
Keeping monetary and fiscal policy separate causes economic distortions, thus the two should be merged. That is, in a recession for example, the government and central bank should simply spend more (and/or collect less tax), and fund the latter from new or “printed” money. Merging monetary and fiscal policy necessitates a different relationship or split of responsibilities as between governments and central banks, but this is not a big problem. Plus the new relationship dispenses with an illogical element in the current typical relationship, namely that both central bank and government influence aggregate demand.
|Date of creation:||25 Apr 2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany|
Web page: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- David Colander, 2002.
"Functional Finance, New Classical Economics and Great Great Grandsons,"
Middlebury College Working Paper Series
0234, Middlebury College, Department of Economics.
- David Colander, 2003. "Functional Finance, New Classical Economics and Great-Great Grandsons," Chapters, in: Reinventing Functional Finance, chapter 2 Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Musgrave, Ralph S., 2010. "Government borrowing is pointless where a government issues its own currency," MPRA Paper 20057, University Library of Munich, Germany.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:30521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joachim Winter)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.