IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/128752.html

Generalized Bayesian Composite Quantile Regression with an Application to Equity Premium Forecasting

Author

Listed:
  • Hardy, Nicolas
  • Korobilis, Dimitris

Abstract

Composite quantile regression (CQR) is a robust and efficient estimator under heavy-tailed and contaminated errors. Existing Bayesian extensions rely on working likelihoods that require latent-variable augmentation and can deliver poorly calibrated credible intervals. We develop generalized Bayesian CQR, which exponentiates the composite quantile loss directly, targeting the same objective as frequentist CQR. Because generalized Bayes replaces point optimization with posterior averaging over the loss surface, it is especially relevant under heavy-tailed errors where the composite quantile loss flattens near its minimum. In generalized Bayes posterior dispersion depends on a learning rate that we calibrate by matching marginal variances to their frequentist sandwich counterparts. The resulting credible intervals achieve near-nominal coverage in cross-sectional settings and substantially reduce the undercoverage of i.i.d.\ intervals under serial dependence, with a residual shortfall under high persistence that mirrors the finite-sample bias of frequentist HAC inference. The calibration has a closed-form solution under flat priors and extends to normal and spike-and-slab LASSO priors for shrinkage and variable selection. Sampling uses standard Metropolis-Hastings with no latent variables, achieving roughly 100-fold computational gains over likelihood-based Bayesian CQR at a common quantile grid. Monte Carlo experiments show competitive or improved point estimation relative to frequentist CQR, reliable coverage, and robust variable selection across Gaussian, heavy-tailed, and contaminated error distributions. An equity premium forecasting application demonstrates that the efficiency and robustness gains translate into economically meaningful improvements in out-of-sample portfolio performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hardy, Nicolas & Korobilis, Dimitris, 2026. "Generalized Bayesian Composite Quantile Regression with an Application to Equity Premium Forecasting," MPRA Paper 128752, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/128752/1/MPRA_paper_128752.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    2. Ledoit, Oliver & Wolf, Michael, 2008. "Robust performance hypothesis testing with the Sharpe ratio," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 850-859, December.
    3. Amit Goyal & Ivo Welch & Athanasse Zafirov, 2024. "A Comprehensive 2022 Look at the Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 37(11), pages 3490-3557.
    4. Bo Kai & Runze Li & Hui Zou, 2010. "Local composite quantile regression smoothing: an efficient and safe alternative to local polynomial regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(1), pages 49-69, January.
    5. Linton, O. & Whang, Yoon-Jae, 2007. "The quantilogram: With an application to evaluating directional predictability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 250-282, November.
    6. Andrew Patton & Dimitris Politis & Halbert White, 2009. "Correction to “Automatic Block-Length Selection for the Dependent Bootstrap” by D. Politis and H. White," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 372-375.
    7. Andrews, Donald W K, 1991. "Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 817-858, May.
    8. Clark, Todd E. & West, Kenneth D., 2007. "Approximately normal tests for equal predictive accuracy in nested models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 291-311, May.
    9. Glosten, Lawrence R & Jagannathan, Ravi & Runkle, David E, 1993. "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(5), pages 1779-1801, December.
    10. Barnett,William A. & Powell,James & Tauchen,George E. (ed.), 1991. "Nonparametric and Semiparametric Methods in Econometrics and Statistics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521370905, August.
    11. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    12. John Y. Campbell & Samuel B. Thompson, 2008. "Predicting Excess Stock Returns Out of Sample: Can Anything Beat the Historical Average?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 21(4), pages 1509-1531, July.
    13. Veronika Ročková & Edward I. George, 2018. "The Spike-and-Slab LASSO," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(521), pages 431-444, January.
    14. Nicholas Syring & Ryan Martin, 2019. "Calibrating general posterior credible regions," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 106(2), pages 479-486.
    15. Christopher J. Neely & David E. Rapach & Jun Tu & Guofu Zhou, 2014. "Forecasting the Equity Risk Premium: The Role of Technical Indicators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1772-1791, July.
    16. Ivo Welch & Amit Goyal, 2008. "A Comprehensive Look at The Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 21(4), pages 1455-1508, July.
    17. Chernozhukov, Victor & Hong, Han, 2003. "An MCMC approach to classical estimation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 293-346, August.
    18. Barnett,William A. & Powell,James & Tauchen,George E. (ed.), 1991. "Nonparametric and Semiparametric Methods in Econometrics and Statistics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521424318, August.
    19. P. G. Bissiri & C. C. Holmes & S. G. Walker, 2016. "A general framework for updating belief distributions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1103-1130, November.
    20. Han, Heejoon & Linton, Oliver & Oka, Tatsushi & Whang, Yoon-Jae, 2016. "The cross-quantilogram: Measuring quantile dependence and testing directional predictability between time series," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 251-270.
    21. S P Lyddon & C C Holmes & S G Walker, 2019. "General Bayesian updating and the loss-likelihood bootstrap," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 106(2), pages 465-478.
    22. Yu, Keming & Moyeed, Rana A., 2001. "Bayesian quantile regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 437-447, October.
    23. Yunwen Yang & Huixia Judy Wang & Xuming He, 2016. "Posterior Inference in Bayesian Quantile Regression with Asymmetric Laplace Likelihood," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(3), pages 327-344, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yaojie Zhang & Feng Ma & Chao Liang & Yi Zhang, 2021. "Good variance, bad variance, and stock return predictability," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4410-4423, July.
    2. Maynard, Alex & Shimotsu, Katsumi & Kuriyama, Nina, 2024. "Inference in predictive quantile regressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 245(1).
    3. Lee, Ji Hyung, 2016. "Predictive quantile regression with persistent covariates: IVX-QR approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 105-118.
    4. Patrick Bielstein, 2018. "International asset allocation using the market implied cost of capital," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 32(1), pages 17-51, February.
    5. Yingying Hu & Huixia Judy Wang & Xuming He & Jianhua Guo, 2021. "Bayesian joint-quantile regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 2033-2053, September.
    6. Moench, Emanuel & Stein, Tobias, 2026. "Equity Premium Predictability over the Business Cycle," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 61(3), pages 1216-1246, May.
    7. Xue Gong & Weiguo Zhang & Yuan Zhao & Xin Ye, 2023. "Forecasting stock volatility with a large set of predictors: A new forecast combination method," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1622-1647, November.
    8. Becker, Janis & Leschinski, Christian, 2018. "Directional Predictability of Daily Stock Returns," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-624, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    9. Maung, Kenwin & Swanson, Norman R., 2025. "A survey of models and methods used for forecasting when investing in financial markets," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 1355-1382.
    10. Bätje, Fabian & Menkhoff, Lukas, 2016. "Predicting the equity premium via its components," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145789, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    11. Andrew Detzel & Hong Liu & Jack Strauss & Guofu Zhou & Yingzi Zhu, 2021. "Learning and predictability via technical analysis: Evidence from bitcoin and stocks with hard‐to‐value fundamentals," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(1), pages 107-137, March.
    12. Lee, Hsiu-Chuan & Lee, Yun-Huan & Nguyen, Cuong, 2023. "Tail comovements of implied volatility indices and global index futures returns predictability," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    13. Nusret Cakici & Christian Fieberg & Daniel Metko & Adam Zaremba, 2024. "Do Anomalies Really Predict Market Returns? New Data and New Evidence," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 28(1), pages 1-44.
    14. Ferrer Fernández, María & Henry, Ólan & Pybis, Sam & Stamatogiannis, Michalis P., 2023. "Can we forecast better in periods of low uncertainty? The role of technical indicators," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-12.
    15. Clint Howard & Harald Lohre & Sebastiaan Mudde, 2025. "Causal Network Representations in Factor Investing," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), March.
    16. Yun‐Huan Lee & Tzu‐Hsiang Liao & Hsiu‐Chuan Lee, 2022. "Overnight returns of industry exchange‐traded funds, investor sentiment, and futures market returns," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(6), pages 1114-1134, June.
    17. Baetje, Fabian & Menkhoff, Lukas, 2016. "Equity premium prediction: Are economic and technical indicators unstable?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 1193-1207.
    18. Qi Lin, 2020. "Idiosyncratic momentum and the cross‐section of stock returns: Further evidence," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 26(3), pages 579-627, June.
    19. Li, Yan & Liang, Chao & Huynh, Toan Luu Duc, 2022. "Forecasting US stock market returns by the aggressive stock-selection opportunity," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    20. Buncic, Daniel & Tischhauser, Martin, 2017. "Macroeconomic factors and equity premium predictability," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 621-644.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • E37 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:128752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.