IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/103531.html

On Ricardo’s Multilayered Method: Wage Taxation and Foreign Subsidies Considered

Author

Listed:
  • Wakamatsu, Naoyuki

Abstract

This paper uses Ricardo’s work on taxation to exemplify his methodological approach of proceeding from abstract theory to practical theory and its correspondence with various facts. Ricardo’s method has been often considered abstract, based on his use of “strong cases.” However, Depoortère (2008) showed that Ricardo emphasized the relationship between theory and experience, and suggested that Ricardo’s method involved an approach leading from abstract theory to particular fact. This paper aims to further Depoortère’s conclusions, and to emphasize the multilayered nature of Ricardo’s method. While Ricardo’s method was based on “strong cases,” he made his arguments by incorporating disturbing factors into his strong cases appropriately according to circumstance.

Suggested Citation

  • Wakamatsu, Naoyuki, 2020. "On Ricardo’s Multilayered Method: Wage Taxation and Foreign Subsidies Considered," MPRA Paper 103531, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:103531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/103531/1/MPRA_paper_103531.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergio Cremaschi & Marcelo Dascal, 1996. "Malthus and Ricardo on Economic Methodology," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 28(3), pages 475-511, Fall.
    2. Morgan,Mary S., 2012. "The World in the Model," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107002975, Enero-Abr.
    3. Morgan,Mary S., 2012. "The World in the Model," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521176194, Enero-Abr.
    4. Dome, Takuo, 1992. "Ricardo's Theory of Tax Incidence: A Sraffian Re-interpretation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 43-53, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arthur Brackmann Netto, 2017. "The Double Edge of Case-Studies: A Frame-Based Definition of Economic Models," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2017_21, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    2. Peter Rodenburg, 2016. "How Full is Full Employment?How Tools and Not Theory Explained Full Employment," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 5-25.
    3. repec:ehl:lserod:103540 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Dorin, Bruno & Joly, Pierre-Benoît, 2020. "Modelling world agriculture as a learning machine? From mainstream models to Agribiom 1.0," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Sachie Mizohata & Raynald Jadoul, 2013. "Towards International and Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration for the Measurements of Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 683-708, May.
    6. Michael McLure & Aldo Montesano, 2020. "Extending Edgeworth: Labour Exchange and Production," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 20-08, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    7. Ramzi Mabsout, 2018. "The Backward Induction Controversy as a Metaphorical Problem," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 7(1), pages 24-49, March.
    8. Khamdamov, T., 2022. "A brief overview of the evolution of computer simulations in economic research," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 189-207.
    9. Łukasz Hard, 2014. "Models of Mechanisms and their Role in Building Economic Explanations," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 37.
    10. Judy L Klein, 2015. "The Cold War Hot House for Modeling Strategies at the Carnegie Institute of Technology," Working Papers Series 19, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    11. Ryan Rumble & Vincent Mangematin, 2015. "Business Model Implementation: The Antecedents of Multi-Sidedness," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01183388, HAL.
    12. Nicola Giocoli, 2016. "Truth or precision? Some reflections on the economists’ failure to predict the financial crisis," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 29(4), pages 371-386, December.
    13. Charles Baden-Fuller & Vincent Mangematin, 2015. "Business Models and Modelling Business Models," Post-Print hal-01183386, HAL.
    14. Asad Zaman, 2020. "Models and Reality: How Did Models Divorced from Reality Become Epistemologically Acceptable?," International Econometric Review (IER), Economic Research Association, vol. 12(1), pages 24-49, April.
    15. Philipp Robinson Rössner, 2019. "Martin Luther and the making of the modern economic mind," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(3), pages 233-248, September.
    16. Mohammad Hajigholizadeh & Assefa M. Melesse & Hector R. Fuentes, 2018. "Erosion and Sediment Transport Modelling in Shallow Waters: A Review on Approaches, Models and Applications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
    17. John Rust, 2014. "The Limits of Inference with Theory: A Review of Wolpin (2013)," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(3), pages 820-850, September.
    18. Mielke, Jahel & Steudle, Gesine A., 2018. "Green Investment and Coordination Failure: An Investors' Perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 88-95.
    19. Dieter Bögenhold, 2017. "Social-scienciation of Economics and its Consequences: On a Relative Convergence between Economics and Sociology," STOREPapers 3_2017, Associazione Italiana per la Storia dell'Economia Politica - StorEP.
    20. Tae-Hee Jo, 2016. "What If There Are No Conventional Price Mechanisms?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 327-344, April.
    21. Drakopoulos, Stavros A., 2014. "Mainstream Aversion to Economic Methodology and the Scientific Ideal of Physics," MPRA Paper 57222, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:103531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.