IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Issues on the Official Poverty Estimation Methodology in the Philippines: Comparability of Estimates across Space and over Time


  • Bersales, Lisa Grace S.


In the effort to effectively monitor the progress or drawbacks in the fight against poverty to formulate more effective poverty reduction programs, the issue on comparability of the official poverty estimates through space and time has been raised. The official estimates are said to be inconsistent across regions because these are based on poverty lines that vary across regions in the country. The differences are due to the use of different menus in calculating the food thresholds for the different regions. The menus are designed to reflect the regional variations in the food consumption patterns of Filipino families. On the other hand, the incomparability of estimates across time has been a hurdle in effectively monitoring progress made over longer period of time. This problem stems from using a changing ratio of food expenditures to total basic expenditures (FE/TBE ratio), an indirect way of estimating the poverty threshold. The ratio changes because the data being used changes each time there is a new FIES dataset. In this paper, Bersales discussed the validity of the current methods, laid out several options and the corresponding merits and/or disadvantages and made several recommendations for future improvement of the current methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Bersales, Lisa Grace S., 2009. "Issues on the Official Poverty Estimation Methodology in the Philippines: Comparability of Estimates across Space and over Time," Discussion Papers DP 2009-17, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2009-17

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Ravallion, Martin & Lokshin, Michael, 2003. "On the utility consistency of poverty lines," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3157, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    poverty; food expenditure to total basic expenditure (FE/TBE); reference menu; test of revealed preferences;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2009-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Aniceto Orbeta). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.