IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/xkhgc_v1.html

From Coal to Cloud: Infrastructural Enclosure and the Politics of Land in West Virginia's AI Buildout

Author

Listed:
  • Kollar, Justin

Abstract

Beneath the dramatic expansion of AI computing and digital systems across the world, data centers and energy systems are being constructed within inherited land and property institutions. Because of this, the consequences of this buildout—including resource strain and environmental and health impacts—are unevenly distributed, particularly in rural areas like Appalachia long structured by concentrated land ownership and extractive power relations. Recent discourse has focused on the implications of AI and digital systems for governance, as well as the immense resource demands of computing infrastructure. This article seeks to link these concerns by examining the unequal power relations involved in the production of computing infrastructure, including “powered land,” through which non-tech entities assemble land and entitlements as an asset for sale or rent to operators and AI labs. Within the historically extractive landscape of West Virginia, I examine the mechanisms of infrastructural enclosure that enable and sustain this asset against local resistance, including the passage of HB 2014 and HB 2002, which aim to remove local land-use authority, divert fiscal resources, and protect consequential information about proposed projects. A critical component of this process is asymmetric legibility, through which project details are made coherent for those within the development network but intentionally fragmented and obscured for affected communities. Infrastructural enclosure extends accumulation by dispossession beyond the appropriation of land and resources to encompass the historically aligned regimes that legitimize dispossession and erode democracy and collective place identity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kollar, Justin, 2026. "From Coal to Cloud: Infrastructural Enclosure and the Politics of Land in West Virginia's AI Buildout," SocArXiv xkhgc_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:xkhgc_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/xkhgc_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a69b92ab68346f077370556/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/xkhgc_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy Wolford & Saturnino M. Borras Jr. & Ruth Hall & Ian Scoones & Ben White & Wendy Wolford & Saturnino M. Borras Jr. & Ruth Hall & Ian Scoones & Ben White, 2013. "Governing Global Land Deals: The Role of the State in the Rush for Land," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 44(2), pages 189-210, March.
    2. Jenny McArthur, 2024. "Infrastructure debt funds and the assetization of public infrastructures," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 681-698, May.
    3. Kelly Kay & Renee Tapp, 2022. "Un/Making Assets: The Institutional Limits to Financialization," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(5), pages 1243-1259, June.
    4. Jovanna Rosen & Luis F. Alvarez León, 2024. "Signaling Hinterlands and the Spatial Networks of Digital Capitalism," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(8), pages 1841-1853, September.
    5. Hilary Oliva Faxon, 2022. "Welcome to the Digital Village: Networking Geographies of Agrarian Change," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(7), pages 2096-2110, October.
    6. Kean Birch & Fabian Muniesa, 2020. "Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism," Post-Print halshs-02878684, HAL.
    7. Nicholas Blomley, 2014. "Making Space for Property," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(6), pages 1291-1306, November.
    8. Stefan Ouma, 2020. "This can(’t) be an asset class: The world of money management, “society†, and the contested morality of farmland investments," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 66-87, February.
    9. Andy Pike & Peter O’Brien & Tom Strickland & Graham Thrower & John Tomaney, 2019. "Financialising City Statecraft and Infrastructure," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18319.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhenfa Li & Fulong Wu & Fangzhu Zhang, 2023. "State de-financialisation through incorporating local government bonds in the budgetary process in China," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(5), pages 1169-1190.
    2. Sarah Ruth Sippel & Oane Visser, 2021. "Introduction to symposium ‘Reimagining land: materiality, affect and the uneven trajectories of land transformation’," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 271-282, February.
    3. Liao, Chuan & Jung, Suhyun & Brown, Daniel G. & Agrawal, Arun, 2024. "Does land tenure change accelerate deforestation? A matching-based four-country comparison," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Glover, Steven & Jones, Sam, 2019. "Can commercial farming promote rural dynamism in sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from Mozambique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 110-121.
    5. Sara Balestri & Mario A. Maggioni, 2021. "This Land Is My Land! Large-Scale Land Acquisitions and Conflict Events in Sub-Saharan Africa," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 427-450, May.
    6. Hunsberger, Carol & Work, Courtney & Herre, Roman, 2018. "Linking climate change strategies and land conflicts in Cambodia: Evidence from the Greater Aural region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 309-320.
    7. Benjamin Raimbault, 2021. "Kean Birch, 2019, Neoliberal Bio-Economies? The Co-Construction of Markets and Natures Palgrave MacMillan, 208 p," Post-Print hal-03559527, HAL.
    8. Igor Calzada, 2024. "Decentralized Web3 Reshaping Internet Governance: Towards the Emergence of New Forms of Nation-Statehood?," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-29, October.
    9. Hanna Hilbrandt & Monika Grubbauer, 2020. "Standards and SSOs in the contested widening and deepening of financial markets: The arrival of Green Municipal Bonds in Mexico City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1415-1433, October.
    10. Anika Trebbin, 2021. "Land Grabbing and Jatropha in India: An Analysis of ‘Hyped’ Discourse on the Subject," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Woods, Kevin M., 2020. "Smaller-scale land grabs and accumulation from below: Violence, coercion and consent in spatially uneven agrarian change in Shan State, Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. Jelke R. Bosma, 2022. "Platformed professionalization: Labor, assets, and earning a livelihood through Airbnb," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 595-610, June.
    13. Murat Arsel & Murat Arsel & Anirban Dasgupta, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 644-665, July.
    14. Matthew Thompson & Vicky Nowak & Alan Southern & Jackie Davies & Peter Furmedge, 2020. "Re-grounding the city with Polanyi: From urban entrepreneurialism to entrepreneurial municipalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1171-1194, September.
    15. Laura Deruytter & David Bassens, 2021. "The Extended Local State under Financialized Capitalism: Institutional Bricolage and the Use of Intermunicipal Companies to Manage Financial Pressure," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 232-248, March.
    16. Sarah Ruth Sippel, 2023. "Tackling land’s ‘stubborn materiality’: the interplay of imaginaries, data and digital technologies within farmland assetization," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 849-863, September.
    17. Jiaxuan Li & Zhiyuan Peng, 2024. "Impact of Digital Villages on Agricultural Green Growth Based on Empirical Analysis of Chinese Provincial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, November.
    18. Tom Barnes, 2024. "Rethinking job loss in an age of assetisation: Lessons from the study of precarious older workers," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 717-735, May.
    19. Fritz-Julius Grafe & Harald A. Mieg, 2021. "Precaution and Innovation in the Context of Wastewater Regulation: An Examination of Financial Innovation under UWWTD Disputes in London and Milan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-10, August.
    20. Nolte, Kerstin & Voget-Kleschin, Lieske, 2014. "Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions: An Evaluation of Three Cases in Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 654-668.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:xkhgc_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.