IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/wkuam_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards a comprehensive terminology on paid parenting leave

Author

Listed:
  • Meil, Gerardo
  • Romero-Balsas, Pedro
  • Dörfler-Bolt, Sonja
  • Escobedo, Anna
  • Ivanova, Dimitrina
  • Mauerer, Gerlinde
  • Moss, Peter
  • Perez-Vaisvidovsky, Nadav
  • Reimer, Thordis

Abstract

This is a report of The COST Action ‘Parental Leave Policies & Social Sustainability’ (CA21150) that provides a detailed exploration of recent developments in terminology, with a particular focus on the language used in leave policies. While the primary emphasis is on leave policies for parents of young children, it is important to note that other types of leave are becoming increasingly relevant. The report is divided into three main sections. The first examines the nomenclature used by international organisations with a focus on leave policies. The second looks at the terminology adopted by individual European countries, while the third reviews the language used in various comparative studies of leave policies. The concluding section reflects on whether a uniform or harmonised terminology for parenting leave policies for young children is desirable or feasible, and if so, what this terminology might entail.

Suggested Citation

  • Meil, Gerardo & Romero-Balsas, Pedro & Dörfler-Bolt, Sonja & Escobedo, Anna & Ivanova, Dimitrina & Mauerer, Gerlinde & Moss, Peter & Perez-Vaisvidovsky, Nadav & Reimer, Thordis, 2025. "Towards a comprehensive terminology on paid parenting leave," SocArXiv wkuam_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:wkuam_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/wkuam_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/681dbd28e5f71ee9225f63be/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/wkuam_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ann-Zofie Duvander & Trude Lappegård & Gerda Neyer & Synøve N. Andersen & Ida Viklund & Ólöf Garðarsdóttir, 2019. "Parental leave policies and continued childbearing in Iceland, Norway, and Sweden," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(51), pages 1501-1528.
    2. Laura Addati, 2015. "Extending maternity protection to all women: Trends, challenges and opportunities," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 69-93, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keonhi Son & Tobias Böger, 2021. "The Inclusiveness of Maternity Leave Rights over 120 Years and across Five Continents," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 275-287.
    2. Stumbitz, Bianca & Lewis, Suzan & Kyei, Abigail A. & Lyon, Fergus, 2018. "Maternity protection in formal and informal economy workplaces: The case of Ghana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 373-384.
    3. Patrick Präg & Christiaan Monden & Seongsoo Choi, 2020. "The sibsize revolution in an international context: Declining social disparities in the number of siblings in 26 countries," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(17), pages 461-500.
    4. Janna Bergsvik & Agnes Fauske & Rannveig Kaldager Hart, 2021. "Can Policies Stall the Fertility Fall? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi‐) Experimental Literature," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 47(4), pages 913-964, December.
    5. Peter Fallesen & Lars Dommermuth & Julia Hellstrand & Emil Simonsen & Lisbeth Trille Gylling Loft & Laust H. Mortensen, 2022. "Research note: comparing ideal family size with observed and forecasted completed cohort fertility in Denmark and Norway," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2022-031, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    6. Jac Thomas & Francisco Rowe & Paul Williamson & Eric S. Lin, 2022. "The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Ásdís Arnalds & Ari Klængur Jónsson & Sunna Símonardóttir, 2025. "The 2021 Baby Boom in Iceland: Exploring the Role of a Parental Leave Reform and the COVID-19 Pandemic," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 41(1), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Keonhi Son & Tobias Böger, 2021. "The Inclusiveness of Maternity Leave Rights over 120 Years and across Five Continents," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 275-287.
    9. Almudena Moreno-Mínguez & à ngel L Martín-Román & Alfonso Moral, 2023. "Father Parental Leave Use in Spain: The Role of the Female Partner Labour Situation," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(1), pages 293-305, February.
    10. Victor Leocádio & Ana Paula Verona & Simone Wajnman, 2025. "A review of research of the relationship between gender equity and fertility in low-fertility settings," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Ann-Zofie Duvander & Trude Lappegard & Mats Johansson, 2020. "Impact of a Reform Towards Shared Parental Leave on Continued Fertility in Norway and Sweden," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(6), pages 1205-1229, December.
    12. Julia Hellstrand & Jessica Nisén & Vitor Miranda & Peter Fallesen & Lars Dommermuth & Mikko Myrskylä, 2020. "Not just later, but fewer: novel trends in cohort fertility in the Nordic countries," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2020-007, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    13. Catherine Pereira-Kotze & Mieke Faber & Tanya Doherty, 2023. "Knowledge, understanding and perceptions of key stakeholders on the maternity protection available and accessible to female domestic workers in South Africa," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-21, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:wkuam_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.