IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/h6vms_v1.html

Panel Study of Russian Public Opinion and Attitudes (PROPA) Wave 4

Author

Listed:
  • Gilev, Aleksei
  • Vyrskaia, Marina
  • Nadporozhskii, Ilia

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

  • Zavadskaya, Margarita

    (Finnish Institute of International Affairs)

Abstract

This fourth wave of the Panel Study of Russian Public Opinion and Attitudes (PROPA), conducted in June 2025, provides new insights into how Russians view the economy, the war in Ukraine, political institutions, propaganda, and the country’s future. Economic perceptions remain broadly stable. Most respondents report that their household income enables them to cover basic and some discretionary expenses, although inflation remains a persistent concern. Evaluations of both personal and national economic conditions have neither improved nor sharply deteriorated, yet perceptions of inflation and limited growth continue to pose risks to regime legitimacy. Attitudes toward the war show a gradual but consistent erosion of open support for the “special military operation,” falling from 52% to 48% since March 2024. Meanwhile, open opposition has grown modestly, and support for peace talks has increased. War fatigue, the spillover of drone attacks into Russian cities, and the disruption of daily life appear to be contributing factors. At the same time, many respondents remain ambivalent or unwilling to state their position, reflecting ongoing fear and censorship. Media consumption patterns highlight the effectiveness of state censorship: YouTube usage has dropped under state throttling, while reliance on Telegram for news has increased. Television remains dominant but shows signs of eroding trust. Political interest remains relatively high, though open discussion of politics has slightly declined, reflecting awareness of repression. Approval of political institutions continues to edge downward. Support for the State Duma and government has weakened, and even Vladimir Putin’s approval shows a modest but consistent decline. Although Putin retains support from more than half of respondents, the rally-around-the-flag effect has clearly waned. Institutions such as the police and courts enjoy particularly low moral authority, while the army and the Russian Orthodox Church remain relatively trusted. Expectations for the future are mixed. While most respondents continue to anticipate economic growth and see renewed mobilization as unlikely, optimism about a quick peace settlement has declined following unmet expectations of U.S.-mediated negotiations. Concerns about rising crime, linked to the reintegration of war veterans, are growing. Overall, the data suggest a society that is economically stable but politically fragile. War weariness, limited trust in institutions, and declining approval of state actors all indicate that the regime’s legitimacy depends increasingly on managing perceptions of economic stability and avoiding sharp shocks that could alter public expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilev, Aleksei & Vyrskaia, Marina & Nadporozhskii, Ilia & Zavadskaya, Margarita, 2026. "Panel Study of Russian Public Opinion and Attitudes (PROPA) Wave 4," SocArXiv h6vms_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:h6vms_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/h6vms_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69c681be406c9b9cb4253e80/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/h6vms_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Gläßel & Katrin Paula, 2020. "Sometimes Less Is More: Censorship, News Falsification, and Disapproval in 1989 East Germany," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 682-698, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgy Egorov & Konstantin Sonin, 2024. "The Political Economics of Non-democracy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 594-636, June.
    2. Bräuninger, Thomas & Marinov, Nikolay, 2022. "Political elites and the “War on Truth’’," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    3. Moshe Maor, 2023. "From institutional tipping points to affective and direct tips: mythical institutions, policy ineffectiveness, and nonlinear political dynamics in East Germany, 1989–1990," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(3), pages 449-467, September.
    4. Krzysztof Krakowski & Max Schaub, 2022. "Elite murder and popular resistance: Evidence from post-World War II Poland," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2022-148, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Li Huang & Oliver Zhen Li & Baiqiang Wang & Zilong Zhang, 2022. "Individualism and the fight against COVID-19," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:h6vms_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.