IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/75hx4_v1.html

Understanding travel satisfaction and barriers to flexible transport services among older adults in urban settings

Author

Listed:
  • Luiu, Carlo

Abstract

As populations in both developed and developing countries continue to age, ensuring access to transportation that meets the mobility needs of older adults is becoming increasingly important. This issue is particularly pressing for individuals who are unable to drive or access private vehicles. Flexible Transport Services (FTS) offer a promising alternative to private transport for older people, thanks to features such as door-to-door accessibility and operational flexibility. This paper investigates travel satisfaction, perceived barriers, and attitudes toward FTS among older adults residing in the urban context of Birmingham, United Kingdom. A mixed-methods approach is employed, beginning with an analysis of travel frequency and purpose associated with FTS use, followed by a thematic analysis aimed at capturing older people's experiences, perceptions, and overall attitudes toward this mode of transport. The analysis reveals six key themes: lack of need, service provision issues, stigma, lack of awareness, convenience, and social implications. These themes highlight both the benefits of FTS and the factors that hinder its use. A central finding is the marked difference in perception between frequent users and non-users. FTS is often viewed negatively by non-users, with three of the four identified barriers predominantly arising from this group. In contrast, frequent users express satisfaction with the service, particularly emphasising its role in meeting discretionary travel needs. This is especially true for individuals over the age of 80 and those with limited access to a car.

Suggested Citation

  • Luiu, Carlo, 2025. "Understanding travel satisfaction and barriers to flexible transport services among older adults in urban settings," SocArXiv 75hx4_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:75hx4_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/75hx4_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/691763a00d87f9d7d03ee663/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/75hx4_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farquhar, Morag, 1995. "Elderly people's definitions of quality of life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1439-1446, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sadiq R. Younes & Bruno Marques & Jacqueline McIntosh, 2024. "Public Spaces for Older People: A Review of the Relationship between Public Space to Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Hu, Shu & Das, Dhiman, 2019. "Quality of life among older adults in China and India: Does productive engagement help?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 144-153.
    3. Felix N. Fernando & Dennis R. Cooley, 2016. "An Oil Boom’s Effect on Quality of Life (QoL): Lessons from Western North Dakota," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 11(4), pages 1083-1115, December.
    4. Gassmann, Franziska & Siegel, Melissa & Vanore, Michaella & Waidler, Jennifer, 2012. "The impact of migration on elderly left behind in Moldova," MERIT Working Papers 2012-082, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    5. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:1163-1173 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Linghan Zhang & Junyi Zhang, 2018. "Impacts of Leisure and Tourism on the Elderly’s Quality of Life in Intimacy: A Comparative Study in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Naqeeb Shah & Basharat Hussain & Samiullah Paracha & Muhammad Shakil Ahmad, 2019. "Impact of Psycho-Social Predictors on the Quality of Life of the Elderly in Pakistan," Proceedings of the 12th International RAIS Conference, April 3-4, 2019 34NS, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    8. Eric Bonsang & Arthur Soest, 2012. "Satisfaction with Social Contacts of Older Europeans," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 273-292, January.
    9. James W. Gentry & Robert A. Mittelstaedt, 2017. "The Rapidly Aging World: Implications For Marketing," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(3_suppl), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Yan, Bingqiu & Gao, Xiaolu & Lyon, Michael, 2014. "Modeling satisfaction amongst the elderly in different Chinese urban neighborhoods," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 127-134.
    11. Massimo Aria & Michelangelo Misuraca & Maria Spano, 2020. "Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 803-831, June.
    12. Jik Lee, 2005. "An Exploratory Study on the Quality of Life of older Chinese People Living alone in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 335-361, March.
    13. Catherine Sundling & Birgitta Berglund & Mats E. Nilsson & Ragne Emardson & Leslie R. Pendrill, 2014. "Overall Accessibility to Traveling by Rail for the Elderly with and without Functional Limitations: The Whole-Trip Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-31, December.
    14. Jane Southcott & Rohan Nethsinghe, 2019. "Resilient Senior Russian-Australian Voices: “We Live to Sing and Sing to Live”," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 39-58, March.
    15. U. R. Arya, 2024. "Unpaid labour of older persons and their subjective well-being: a study based on Kerala, India," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 26(3), pages 840-861, December.
    16. Weite Lu & Chunqin Zhang & Xunyou Ni & Haiqiang Liu, 2020. "Do the Elderly Need Wider Parking Spaces? Evidence from Experimental and Questionnaire Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Ory, David T. & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2005. "When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(2-3), pages 97-123.
    18. Maya Benish-Weisman & Samuel Shye, 2011. "Life Quality of Russian Immigrants to Israel: Patterns of Success and of Unsuccess," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 461-479, May.
    19. Miriam Sang-Ah Park & Mohsen Joshanloo, 2021. "Satisfaction with Life Declines with Age in Malaysia: an Exploratory Analysis of Factors Influencing Subjective Well-Being in a Developing/Middle-Income Country," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 471-486, April.
    20. Hackert, Mariska Q.N. & Brouwer, Werner B.F. & Hoefman, Renske J. & van Exel, Job, 2019. "Views of older people in the Netherlands on wellbeing: A Q-methodology study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    21. Izabela Kurtyka-Marcak & Maria Hełdak & Katarzyna Przybyła, 2019. "The Actual Demand for the Elimination of Architectural Barriers among Senior Citizens in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:75hx4_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.