IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/2g7yd.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Double-Edged Sword of Banning Extremists from Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Jackson, Sam

Abstract

Over the past few years, researchers, activists, and policymakers have engaged in debates over how social media companies should respond to extremism on their platforms. One facet of this debate focuses on the consequences – online and offline – of different approaches. Debates about the effectiveness of various approaches have not recognized that there are two different goals: reducing extremist violence and reducing extremism. This article presents a thought experiment that unpacks these goals, thinks through possible relationships between different approaches and different goals, and suggests a number of hypotheses that could be tested to empirically investigate the consequences of banning or tolerating extremists on social media.

Suggested Citation

  • Jackson, Sam, 2019. "The Double-Edged Sword of Banning Extremists from Social Media," SocArXiv 2g7yd, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:2g7yd
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/2g7yd
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5d1b5e694994dd0018161ca1/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/2g7yd?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher A. Bail & Lisa P. Argyle & Taylor W. Brown & John P. Bumpus & Haohan Chen & M. B. Fallin Hunzaker & Jaemin Lee & Marcus Mann & Friedolin Merhout & Alexander Volfovsky, 2018. "Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(37), pages 9216-9221, September.
    2. Albert Breton & Gianluigi Galeotti & Pierre Salmon & Ronald Wintrobe, 2002. "Political Extremism and Rationality," Post-Print hal-00445585, HAL.
    3. Breton,Albert & Galeotti,Gianluigi & Salmon,Pierre & Wintrobe,Ronald (ed.), 2002. "Political Extremism and Rationality," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521804417.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai Spiekermann, 2020. "Epistemic network injustice," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 19(1), pages 83-101, February.
    2. Karen Pittel & Dirk Rübbelke, 2011. "Characteristics of Terrorism," Chapters, in: Derek L. Braddon & Keith Hartley (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Conflict, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Hirofumi Shimizu, 2011. "Social cohesion and self-sacrificing behavior," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 427-440, December.
    4. Mario Ferrero, 2005. "Radicalization as a reaction to failure: An economic model of Islamic extremism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 199-220, January.
    5. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2019. "Cultural attitudes, economic shocks and political radicalization," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 62(3), pages 529-562, June.
    6. Bruno S. Frey, 2008. "Terrorism and business," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 172-183.
    7. Pierre Salmon, 2017. "Is democracy exportable?," Working Papers halshs-01516493, HAL.
    8. Michael Mandler and Michael Spagat, 2003. "Foreign Aid Designed to Diminish Terrorist Atrocities can Increase Them," Royal Holloway, University of London: Discussion Papers in Economics 03/10, Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London, revised Dec 2003.
    9. Bo Ning & Irfan Ahmed Rind & Muhammad Mujtaba Asad, 2020. "Influence of Teacher Educators on the Development of Prospective Teachers’ Personal Epistemology and Tolerance," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, March.
    10. Greiner, Michael & Lee, Jaegul, 2020. "A supply-side approach to corporate political activity: Performance consequences of ideologically driven CPA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 25-37.
    11. Patrick Mardini, 2015. "The Endangered Classical Liberal Tradition in Lebanon: A General Description and Survey Results," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 12(2), pages 242–259-2, May.
    12. Cortney Stephen Rodet, 2017. "Poor institutions as a comparative advantage," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 167-192, June.
    13. Elie Appelbaum & Eliakim Katz, 2007. "Political extremism in the presence of a free rider problem," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 31-40, October.
    14. Faia, Ester & Fuster, Andreas & Pezone, Vincenzo & Zafar, Basit, 2021. "Biases in information selection and processing: Survey evidence from the pandemic," SAFE Working Paper Series 307, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    15. Dickinson, David L., 2020. "Deliberation Enhances the Confirmation Bias: An Examination of Politics and Religion," IZA Discussion Papers 13241, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Iandoli, Luca & Primario, Simonetta & Zollo, Giuseppe, 2021. "The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    17. Andrew F Smith, 2014. "Political deliberation and the challenge of bounded rationality," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 13(3), pages 269-291, August.
    18. Deole, Sumit S. & Huang, Yue, 2020. "Suffering and prejudice: Do negative emotions predict immigration concerns?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 644, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    19. Thomas Fujiwara & Karsten Müller & Carlo Schwarz, 2021. "The Effect of Social Media on Elections: Evidence from the United States," NBER Working Papers 28849, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Aleardo Zanghellini, 2020. "Philosophical Problems With the Gender-Critical Feminist Argument Against Trans Inclusion," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:2g7yd. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.