IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oml/wpaper/202301.html

Cooperative Property Rights and Development: Evidence from Land Reform in El Salvador: A Comment

Author

Listed:
  • Anders Kjelsrud

    (Oslo Business School, Oslo Metropolitan University)

  • Andreas Kotsadam

    (The Frisch Centre, Oslo/Norway)

  • Ole Rogeberg

    (The Frisch Centre, Oslo/Norway)

Abstract

Montero (2022) explores a discontinuity in a land reform in El Salvador and reports two main findings. First, relative to outside-owned haciendas operated by contract workers, the productivity of worker-owned cooperatives is higher for staple crops and lower for cash-crop. Second, cooperative property rights increase workers' incomes and compress wage distributions. In this comment, we show that the latter result rests on two mistakes: three-quarters of the observations are duplicates and income inequality is calculated over too few workers to be meaningful. When corrected, the data sources and research design provide no credible evidence regarding the causal effects of ownership structure on income levels and inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders Kjelsrud & Andreas Kotsadam & Ole Rogeberg, 2023. "Cooperative Property Rights and Development: Evidence from Land Reform in El Salvador: A Comment," Working Papers 202301, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo Business School.
    • Handle: RePEc:oml:wpaper:202301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/i4rdps/20.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guillaume Coqueret, 2023. "Forking paths in financial economics," Papers 2401.08606, arXiv.org.
    2. McWay, Ryan & Braaksma, Matthew, 2025. "The political consequences of resource scarcity: Targeted spending in a water-stressed democracy. A replication study of Mahadevan and Shenoy (Journal of Public Economics, 2023)," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oml:wpaper:202301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eirik Hanssen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ohioano.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.