IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stiaab/292-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Going Digital integrated policy framework

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

Digital transformation has widespread and complex effects across the economy and society. It impacts many policy domains and makes trade-offs between public policy objectives more difficult to navigate. The Going Digital Integrated Policy Framework helps governments and stakeholders to develop an integrated approach to policy making in the digital age and to shape policies for an inclusive digital future. This report outlines the framework’s seven interrelated policy dimensions: 1) access to communications infrastructures, services and data; 2) effective use of digital technologies and data; 3) digital and data-driven innovation; 4) good jobs for all; 5) social prosperity and inclusion; 6) trust in the digital age; and 7) market openness in digital business environments. The report also highlights transversal policy issues (e.g. skills, digital government, SMEs and data) that cut across several policy dimensions. Finally, this report provides guidance on putting the framework into practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2020. "Going Digital integrated policy framework," OECD Digital Economy Papers 292, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:stiaab:292-en
    DOI: 10.1787/dc930adc-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/dc930adc-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/dc930adc-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gregorio Gimenez & Luis Vargas-Montoya, 2021. "ICT Use and Successful Learning: The Role of the Stock of Human Capital," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-15, July.
    2. De la O Campos, Ana Paula & Edouard, Fabrice & Salvago, Marta Ruiz, 2023. "Effects of land titling on household tenure security and investments: Evidence from Nicaragua," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Unger, Eva-Maria & Bennett, Rohan Mark & Lemmen, Christiaan & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2021. "LADM for sustainable development: An exploratory study on the application of domain-specific data models to support the SDGs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Yu Song & Chenfei Qian & Susan Pickard, 2021. "Age-Related Digital Divide during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Norman V. Loayza & Steven Pennings, 2020. "Macroeconomic Policy in the Time of COVID-19," World Bank Publications - Reports 33540, The World Bank Group.
    6. Sörries, Bernd & Franken, Matthias & Baischew, Dajan & Lucidi, Stefano, 2020. "Einfluss von Versorgungsauflagen auf die Mobilfunkabdeckung in der EU," WIK Discussion Papers 470, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    7. Tandon, Anushree & Dhir, Amandeep & Islam, Nazrul & Talwar, Shalini & Mäntymäki, Matti, 2021. "Psychological and behavioral outcomes of social media-induced fear of missing out at the workplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 186-197.
    8. Vásáry, Viktória & Szabolcs, Biró, 2020. "Long-term vision of rural areas in Hungary, focusing on foresights," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 17.
    9. van Oosterom, Peter & Unger, Eva-Maria & Lemmen, Christiaan, 2022. "The second themed article collection on the land administration domain model (LADM)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Tzu-Chieh Lin & Kung Jeng Wang, 2021. "Project-based maturity assessment model for smart transformation in Taiwanese enterprises," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Ho, Serene & Choudhury, Pranab R. & Joshi, Richa, 2023. "Community participation for inclusive land administration: A case study of the Odisha urban slum formalization project," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stiaab:292-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.