IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ieaaaa/2012-7-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

CCS Retrofit: Analysis of the Globally Installed Coal-Fired Power Plant Fleet

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Finkenrath

    (International Energy Agency)

  • Julian Smith

    (International Energy Agency)

  • Dennis Volk

    (International Energy Agency)

Abstract

Electricity generation from coal is still growing rapidly and energy scenarios from the IEA expect a possible increase from today's 1 600 GW of coal-fired power plants to over 2 600 GW until 2035. This trend will increase the lock-in of carbon intensive electricity sources, while IEA assessments show that two-thirds of total abatement from all sectors should come from the power sector alone to support a least-cost abatement strategy. Since coal-fired power plants have a fairly long lifetime, and in order to meet climate constraints, there is a need either to apply CCS retrofit to some of today's installed coal-fired power plants once the technology becomes available. Another option would be to retire some plants before the end of their lifetime. This working paper discusses criteria relevant to differentiating between the technical, cost-effective and realistic potential for CCS retrofit. The paper then discusses today's coal-fired power plant fleet from a statistical perspective, by looking at age, size and the expected performance of today's plant across several countries. The working paper also highlights the growing demand for applying CCS retrofitting to the coal-fired power plant fleet of the future.In doing so this paper aims at emphasising the need for policy makers, innovators and power plant operators to quickly complete the development of the CCS technology and to identify key countries where retrofit applications will have the biggest extent and impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Finkenrath & Julian Smith & Dennis Volk, 2012. "CCS Retrofit: Analysis of the Globally Installed Coal-Fired Power Plant Fleet," IEA Energy Papers 2012/7, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:ieaaaa:2012/7-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5k9crztg40g1-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9crztg40g1-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5k9crztg40g1-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Groot, R.A.F. & van der Veen, V.G. & Sebitosi, A.B., 2013. "Comparing solar PV (photovoltaic) with coal-fired electricity production in the centralized network of South Africa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 823-837.
    2. Ozawa, A. & Tsani, T. & Kudoh, Y., 2022. "Japan's pathways to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 – Scenario analysis using an energy modeling methodology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Stevanovic, Vladimir D. & Petrovic, Milan M. & Wala, Tadeusz & Milivojevic, Sanja & Ilic, Milica & Muszynski, Slawomir, 2019. "Efficiency and power upgrade at the aged lignite-fired power plant by flue gas waste heat utilization: High pressure versus low pressure economizer installation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Viebahn, Peter & Vallentin, Daniel & Höller, Samuel, 2015. "Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in China’s power sector – An integrated assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 229-244.
    5. Xiaoyang Sun & Baosheng Zhang & Xu Tang & Benjamin C. McLellan & Mikael Höök, 2016. "Sustainable Energy Transitions in China: Renewable Options and Impacts on the Electricity System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Wu, Xiaomei & Fan, Huifeng & Sharif, Maimoona & Yu, Yunsong & Wei, Keming & Zhang, Zaoxiao & Liu, Guangxin, 2021. "Electrochemically-mediated amine regeneration of CO2 capture: From electrochemical mechanism to bench-scale visualization study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    7. Krishnan, Venkat & Das, Trishna, 2015. "Optimal allocation of energy storage in a co-optimized electricity market: Benefits assessment and deriving indicators for economic storage ventures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 175-188.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ieaaaa:2012/7-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ieaaafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.