IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/elsaab/222-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How do Europeans differ in their attitudes to immigration?: Findings from the European Social Survey 2002/03 – 2016/17

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Heath

    (Centre for Social Investigation, Nuffield College, Oxford)

  • Lindsay Richards

    (Centre for Social Investigation, Nuffield College, Oxford)

Abstract

Nordic countries such as Sweden, Norway and Finland have been consistently the most favourable to immigration while eastern European countries such as the Czech Republic and Hungary have been the least favourable. Despite their relatively high average levels of support for immigration, however, many countries of western and northern Europe are quite strongly polarized internally along educational and age lines. This can perhaps explain why political divisions over immigration can be so salient in these countries. Comparing results from 2002/03 and 2016/07, one finds that European attitudes were on average quite stable. However, a number of countries became more generous while several others became more negative. On the issue of government policy towards refugees, there was a marked shift in a negative direction after the 2015/16 refugee crisis. Countries such as Austria, Germany, and Sweden which had experienced large inflows of refugees showed particularly large declines in public support for generous government policy towards asylum requests.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Heath & Lindsay Richards, 2019. "How do Europeans differ in their attitudes to immigration?: Findings from the European Social Survey 2002/03 – 2016/17," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 222, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:222-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/0adf9e55-en
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Social Survey; Immigration; Public opinion; Refugees; Symbolic boundaries;

    JEL classification:

    • F22 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Migration
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J61 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Geographic Labor Mobility; Immigrant Workers

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:222-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/eloecfr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.