IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Product Market Regulation and Competition in China


  • Paul Conway
  • Richard Herd


  • Thomas Chalaux


  • Ping He

    (National Bureau of Statistics)

  • Jianxun Yu

    (National Bureau of Statistics)


The extent of competition in product markets is an important determinant of economic growth in both developed and developing countries. This paper uses the 2008 vintage of the OECD indicators of product market regulation to assess the extent to which China’s regulatory environment is supportive of competition in markets for goods and services. The results indicate that, although competition is increasingly robust across most markets, the overall level of product market regulation is still restrictive in international comparison. These impediments to competition are likely to constrain economic growth as the Chinese economy continues to develop and becomes more sophisticated. The paper goes on to review various aspects of China’s regulatory framework and suggests a number of policy initiatives that would improve the extent to which competitive market forces are able to operate. Breaking the traditional links between state-owned enterprises and government agencies is an ongoing challenge. Reducing administrative burdens, increasing private sector involvement in network sectors and lowering barriers to foreign direct investment in services would also increase competition and enhance productivity growth going forward. Some of the reforms introduced by the Chinese government over the past two years go in this direction and should therefore help foster growth. This paper relates to the 2010 OECD Economic Review of China ( Règlementation du marché des produits et concurrence en Chine L’étendue de la concurrence sur le marché des produits est un déterminant important de la croissance économique dans les pays développés et en développement. Ce papier utilise la version 2008 des indicateurs de réglementation du marché des produits de l’OCDE pour évaluer dans quelle mesure l’environnement règlementaire en Chine favorise la concurrence sur les marchés de biens et services. Les résultats indiquent que, bien que la concurrence s’intensifie sur la plupart des marchés, le niveau général de la réglementation demeure restrictif au plan international. Ces entraves à la concurrence sont susceptibles de freiner la croissance à mesure que l’économie chinoise continue de se développer et devient plus sophistiquée. Ce papier examine ensuite différents aspects du cadre règlementaire chinois, et suggère différents types de mesures qui donneraient une plus grande latitude aux forces de marché. Briser les liens traditionnels entre entreprises publiques et agences gouvernementales reste un défi. Réduire les contraintes administratives, accroître la participation du secteur privé dans les secteurs de réseau et abaisser les barrières à l’investissement direct étranger dans les services stimuleraient aussi la concurrence et les progrès de productivité. Certaines des réformes introduites par le gouvernement chinois durant les deux dernières années vont dans ce sens et devraient donc encourager la croissance. Ce document se rapporte à l’Étude économique de la Chine de l’OCDE, 2010, (

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Conway & Richard Herd & Thomas Chalaux & Ping He & Jianxun Yu, 2010. "Product Market Regulation and Competition in China," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 823, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:823-en

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Alves, Moises & Ponce, Gustavo H.S.F. & Silva, Maria Aparecida & Ensinas, Adriano V., 2015. "Surplus electricity production in sugarcane mills using residual bagasse and straw as fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 751-757.
    2. International Monetary Fund, 2012. "Republic of Belarus; Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 12/114, International Monetary Fund.

    More about this item


    China; Chine; macroeconomic policies; politique macro-économique; productivity; productivité; regulatory; régulation;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:823-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.