IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ecoaaa/582-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Costs of Delaying fiscal Consolidation: A Case Study for Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Vassiliki Koutsogeorgopoulou

    (OECD)

  • David Turner

    (OECD)

Abstract

Since 2004, the fiscal deficit has been brought down by over 5% of GDP to below the 3% limit in 2006, which is a major achievement. The government plans a more gradual reduction over coming years so that overall balance or surplus is reached no later than 2010. However, fiscal consolidation should continue, possibly at a more rapid pace than planned, given the high level of government debt, favourable outlook for output growth, and long-term fiscal costs of ageing which are estimated to be among the largest in the OECD. There are as yet no specific proposals to reform pensions, which account for most of the prospective ageing-related increase in public expenditure, although the government is expected to announce reforms following the publication of a report from a Committee of Experts. Delaying fiscal consolidation, particularly the urgently needed pension reform, would have substantial longer-term costs in terms of higher taxes and additional debt service costs, including an increase in the risk premium paid on government debt. In addition, this would heavily skew the tax burden towards future generations. Consolidation should focus on reducing primary spending and on enhancing tax revenues. This can be achieved particularly through increased efficiency of public administration and by measures to tackle tax evasion and further broaden the tax base. Ensuring long-run fiscal sustainability will also require the implementation of wide-ranging reforms in the key area of health care, as well as an early decision to introduce a comprehensive reform of the pension system. Les coûts d'un report de la consolidation budgétaire : une étude dans le cas de la Grèce La réduction du déficit budgétaire, ramené de 5 % du PIB en 2004 à moins de 3 % en 2006, est une réussite majeure. Les autorités prévoient une diminution plus progressive dans les prochaines années jusqu’à ce que le budget soit en équilibre ou excédentaire, au plus tard en 2010. Cependant, l’assainissement budgétaire devrait se poursuivre – peut-être à un rythme plus rapide que prévu - étant donné le niveau élevé de la dette publique, les perspectives favorables à la croissance de la production et les coûts budgétaires à long terme du vieillissement, qui sont parmi les plus élevés de la zone OCDE. Il n’est pas encore prévu d’initiatives spécifiques pour réformer les retraites, principale source de l’accroissement prévisible des dépenses publiques résultant du vieillissement, même si le gouvernement doit annoncer des mesures dans le courant de cette année. Différer l’assainissement des finances publiques, surtout la réforme des retraites qui s’impose d’urgence, entraînerait des coûts à long terme considérables sous forme d’une hausse de la fiscalité et d’un alourdissement du service de la dette, avec notamment une augmentation de la prime de risque appliquée à la dette publique. De surcroît, ceci reviendrait à transférer une lourde charge fiscale aux générations futures. Les efforts d’assainissement devraient tendre surtout à réduire les dépenses primaires et accroître les recettes fiscales. On peut y parvenir par l’amélioration de l’efficacité de l’administration publique en particulier, et en luttant contre la fraude et en prenant d’autres mesures pour élargir la base d’imposition. Pour garantir la viabilité budgétaire à long terme, il faudra aussi engager des réformes d’envergure dans le secteur clé de la santé et décider promptement de lancer une réforme complète du système de retraite.

Suggested Citation

  • Vassiliki Koutsogeorgopoulou & David Turner, 2007. "The Costs of Delaying fiscal Consolidation: A Case Study for Greece," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 582, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:582-en
    DOI: 10.1787/063623425055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/063623425055
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/063623425055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Glomm, Gerhard & Jung, Juergen & Tran, Chung, 2018. "Fiscal Austerity Measures: Spending Cuts Vs. Tax Increases," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 501-540, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ageing; assainissement budgétaire; debt; deficit; dette; déficit; dépenses; fiscal consolidation; fraude fiscale; pensions; recettes; retraites; revenues; spending; tax evasion; vieillissement;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • H62 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Deficit; Surplus
    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:582-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.