IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Microeconometric Analysis of the Retirement Decision: United Kingdom

  • Raffaele Miniaci
  • Elena Stancanelli

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the retirement decision in the United Kingdom. We distinguish four retirement routes: retirement, unemployment, long-term sickness and other states. The focus of the paper is the impact of pension benefits on retirement transitions. We estimate multinomial logits and Cox proportional hazard rate models, separately for men and women. We conclude that participation in an occupational pension scheme increases the retirement hazard rate for men. The results for women are less clear-cut given the relatively small number of women entitled to an occupational pension scheme ... Cet article a pour objectif l'analyse de la décision de partir à la retraite au Royaume-Uni. Nous distinguons quatre voies de retrait du travail pour les personnes âgées: retraite, chômage, maladie de longue durée et autres. Le papier porte plus particulièrement sur l'impact des pensions professionnelles sur les transitions vers la retraite. Nous estimons des modèles logits multinomiaux et des modèles de Cox à taux de risqué proportionnel, séparément pour les hommes et les femmes. La conclusion que nous en tirons est que la participation à un régime de retraite professionnel accroît, chez les hommes, le taux de risque de retraite. Les résultats concernant les femmes sont moins précis étant donné le nombre relativement faible de femmes affiliées à un régime de retraite professionnel ...

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 403 Forbidden ( [303 See Other]--> If this is indeed the case, please notify ()

Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Economics Department Working Papers with number 206.

in new window

Date of creation: 24 Jun 1998
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:206-en
Contact details of provider: Postal: 2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:206-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.