IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ecoaaa/1538-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Income, wealth and earnings inequality in Australia: Evidence from the HILDA survey

Author

Listed:
  • Urban Sila
  • Valéry Dugain

Abstract

This paper analyses income, wealth and earnings inequality in Australia, using the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey as the primary source of data. Income inequality in Australia has risen in the last two decades, but most of the rise occurred prior to the global financial crisis. HILDA data nevertheless show evidence of slower income growth in the middle of the income distribution compared with the top and the bottom. While Australia has experienced a rising inequality in wages – mostly through rapid earnings increases among top earners - this has been offset by increased participation and longer hours worked at the bottom of the distribution. According to HILDA data, relative pay across different levels of education groups has not recorded large shifts over the last 15 years. At the same time, we find evidence for job polarisation; notably, the share of high skilled jobs versus middle skilled jobs has increased. With respect to concerns about the casualisation of the labour force and less stable nature of jobs amid technological change and globalisation, the incidence of casual employment – where workers receive no paid sick leave or holiday leave - in Australia has been reported to have risen since the 1980s, especially for females. According to HILDA data however, the incidence of casual employment has fallen since early 2000s. Furthermore, we find no evidence that contract duration has shortened over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Urban Sila & Valéry Dugain, 2019. "Income, wealth and earnings inequality in Australia: Evidence from the HILDA survey," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1538, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1538-en
    DOI: 10.1787/cab6789d-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/cab6789d-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/cab6789d-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Breunig & Diana Hourani & Sasan Bakhtiari & Elisabetta Magnani, 2020. "Do financial constraints affect the composition of workers of a firm?," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 23(1), pages 79-97.
    2. Ng, Matthew Kok Ming & Roper, Josephine & Pettit, Christopher & Lee, Chyi Lin, 2021. "The Reflection of Income Segregation and Accessibility Cleavages in Sydney’s House Prices," SocArXiv 2psk5, Center for Open Science.
    3. Patricia Apps & Ray Rees, 2022. "Inequality measurement and tax/transfer policy," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 29(4), pages 953-984, August.
    4. Roya Taherifar & Mark J. Holmes & Gazi M. Hassan, 2023. "The drivers of labour share and impact on pay inequality: A firm-level investigation," Working Papers in Economics 23/03, University of Waikato.
    5. Roger Wilkins, 2021. "Economic Wellbeing," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 54(4), pages 469-481, December.
    6. David Gunawan & William E. Griffiths & Duangkamon Chotikapanich, 2021. "Posterior Probabilities for Lorenz and Stochastic Dominance of Australian Income Distributions," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 97(319), pages 504-524, December.
    7. Maximilian Longmuir, 2021. "Fair Crack of the Whip? The Distribution of Augmented Wealth in Australia from 2002 to 2018," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2021n04, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    8. David Gunawan & William E. Griffiths & Duangkamon Chotikapanich, 2020. "Posterior Probabilities for Lorenz and Stochastic Dominance of Australian Income Distributions," Papers 2005.04870, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Australia; earnings inequality; HILDA; household panel; income distribution; income mobility; inequality; job polarisation; wealth inequality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity
    • J2 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor
    • J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1538-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.