IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the Efficiency of Welfare Spending in Slovenia with Data Envelopment Analysis


  • Matevz Hribernik

    (Institute of Macroeconomic Analysis and Development)

  • Rafal Kierzenkowski



This paper derives estimates of the efficiency of welfare spending in Slovenia and the other OECD countries from data envelopment analysis based on model specifications used in earlier OECD studies. Results suggest that Slovenia ranks about 25th among OECD countries for output efficiency: for a given level of spending outcomes fall short by around 3.5% in health care, by 10% in secondary education and by around one third in public administration. Results also suggests that Slovenia ranks 18th to 27th in the OECD for input efficiency as the same outcomes could be reached by scaling back costs by around half. Alternatively, spending increases could be contained and outcomes improved by increased cost efficiency. Statistical uncertainty surrounding input efficiency estimates is high for countries with the smallest scope for potential savings. Confidence intervals around output efficiency scores are also wide for some emerging market economies. Évaluation de l'efficacité des dépenses sociales en Slovénie avec la méthode d'enveloppement des données Cet article déduit les estimations de l'efficacité des dépenses sociales en Slovénie et dans les autres pays de l'OCDE à partir de l'analyse d'enveloppement des données basée sur les spécifications de modèles utilisés dans les études antérieures de l'OCDE. Les résultats suggèrent que la Slovénie se classe 25ème parmi les pays de l'OCDE pour l’efficacité productive: pour un niveau donné de dépenses les résultats sont en deçà d'environ 3,5% dans les soins de santé, de 10% dans l'enseignement secondaire et d'environ un tiers dans l'administration publique. Les résultats suggèrent également que la Slovénie se classe entre le 18ème et 27ème rang au sein de l'OCDE pour l'efficacité des intrants puisque les mêmes résultats peuvent être obtenus en réduisant les coûts de moitié environ. Alternativement, les hausses de dépenses pourraient être contenues et les résultats améliorés grâce à une meilleure efficacité-coût. L'incertitude statistique entourant les estimations de l'efficacité des intrants est élevée pour les pays ayant la plus faible marge de manoeuvre en termes d'économies potentielles. Les intervalles de confiance autour des scores d'efficacité productive sont également larges pour certains pays émergents.

Suggested Citation

  • Matevz Hribernik & Rafal Kierzenkowski, 2013. "Assessing the Efficiency of Welfare Spending in Slovenia with Data Envelopment Analysis," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1058, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1058-en

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Stephen Taylor & Derek Yu, 2009. "The importance of socio-economic status in determining educational achievement in South Africa," Working Papers 01/2009, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
    2. Servaas BERG & Onelle BURGER, 2003. "Education And Socio-Economic Differentials: A Study Of School Performance In The Western Cape," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 71(3), pages 496-522, September.
    3. Steven N. Durlauf & Andros Kourtellos & Chih Ming Tan, 2012. "Is God in the details? A reexamination of the role of religion in economic growth," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(7), pages 1059-1075, November.
    4. Morné Oosthuizen & Haroon Bhorat, 2005. "The Post-Apartheid South African Labour Market," Working Papers 05093, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
    5. Servaas van der Berg, 2006. "How effective are poor schools? Poverty and educational outcomes in South Africa," Working Papers 06/2006, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
    6. Anne Case & Angus Deaton, 1999. "School Inputs and Educational Outcomes in South Africa," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 114(3), pages 1047-1084.
    7. Theo S. Eicher & Christian Henn & Chris Papageorgiou, 2012. "Trade creation and diversion revisited: Accounting for model uncertainty and natural trading partner effects," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 296-321, March.
    8. Megan Louw & Servaas Van der berg & Derek Yu, 2007. "Convergence Of A Kind: Educational Attainment And Intergenerational Social Mobility In South Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 75(3), pages 548-571, September.
    9. Fedderke, J W & Luiz, J M, 2002. "Production of Educational Output: Time-Series Evidence from Socioeconomically Heterogeneous Populations--The Case of South Africa, 1927-1993," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(1), pages 161-187, October.
    10. Martin Gustafsson & Thabo Mabogoane, 2012. "South Africa's economics of education: A stocktaking and an agenda for the way forward," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 351-364, September.
    11. Servaas van der Berg, 2007. "Apartheid's Enduring Legacy: Inequalities in Education-super- 1," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), vol. 16(5), pages 849-880, November.
    12. Paula Armstrong, 2009. "The impact of teacher characteristics on student performance: An analysis using hierarchical linear modelling," Working Papers 07/2009, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
    13. Martin Gustafsson, 2007. "Using The Hierarchical Linear Model To Understand School Production In South Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 75(1), pages 84-98, March.
    14. Haroon Bhorat & Morne Oosthuizen, 2009. "Determinants of Grade 12 Pass Rates in the Post-Apartheid South African Schooling System," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), vol. 18(4), pages 634-666, August.
    15. Anne Case & Motohiro Yogo, 1999. "Does School Quality Matter? Returns to Education and the Characteristics of Schools in South Africa," Working Papers 219, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies..
    16. Stephen Taylor & Servaas van der Berg & Vijay Reddy & Dean Janse van Rensburg, 2011. "How well do South African schools convert grade 8 achievement into matric outcomes?," Working Papers 13/2011, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
    17. Liang, Feng & Paulo, Rui & Molina, German & Clyde, Merlise A. & Berger, Jim O., 2008. "Mixtures of g Priors for Bayesian Variable Selection," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 410-423, March.
    18. repec:pri:rpdevs:case_yogo_school_quality is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Brieuc Monfort, 2015. "Can Increased Public Expenditure Efficiency Contribute to the Consolidation of Public Finances in Japan?," Working Papers halshs-01548620, HAL.

    More about this item


    administration publique; data envelopment analysis; dépenses sociales; efficacité; efficiency; enseignement secondaire; health; méthode d’enveloppement des données; OCDE; OECD; PISA; PISA; public administration; santé; secondary education; Slovenia; Slovénie; welfare spending;

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1058-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.