IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/dafaad/20-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Coverage of Private Pension Systems: Evidence and Policy Options

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Antolin
  • Stéphanie Payet

    (OECD)

  • Juan Yermo

Abstract

To adapt pension systems to demographic trends, many countries are reducing pay-as-you-go public pension levels and lifting retirement ages. In this context, funded pensions could play a major role to avoid adequacy gaps. Yet, as this paper shows, the coverage of funded private pensions, as measured by enrolment rates, is highly uneven across countries and between individuals, especially in voluntary systems. Some countries have made funded pensions compulsory (e.g. Australia, Chile) or quasimandatory (e.g. Denmark, the Netherlands) to ensure that most workers are covered and therefore have access to a sufficiently high complementary pension. However, in other countries with relatively low pay-as-you-go public pension benefits, funded private provision remains voluntary. The low level of funded pensions’ coverage in such countries should be a major policy concern. Recent policy initiatives in Germany and New Zealand, involving the introduction of financial incentives (and auto enrolment in New Zealand) have been effective in raising coverage to the highest levels among voluntary pension arrangements, but coverage gaps remain that need to be addressed. Couverture des systèmes de pensions privées : preuve et options politiques Pour adapter les systèmes de retraite aux tendances démographiques, de nombreux pays réduisent les niveaux des retraites publiques par répartition et relèvent les âges de départ à la retraite. Dans ce contexte, les retraites par capitalisation pourraient jouer un rôle majeur pour éviter des écarts d’adéquation. Toutefois, comme le montre ce document, la couverture des pensions privées par capitalisation, telle que mesurée par les taux d’adhésion, est fortement inégale entre les pays et entre les individus, en particulier dans les systèmes volontaires. Certains pays ont rendu les pensions par capitalisation obligatoires (par ex. l’Australie, le Chile)ou quasi-obligatoires (par ex. le Danemark, les Pays-Bas) pour s’assurer que la plupart des travailleurs sont couverts et ont ainsi accès à une retraite complémentaire suffisamment élevée. En revanche, dans d’autres pays, où les prestations des retraites publiques par répartition sont relativement faibles, l’offre privée par capitalisation reste volontaire. La faible couverture des pensions par capitalisation dans ces pays devrait être un souci politique majeur. De récentes initiatives politiques en Allemagne et en Nouvelle-Zélande, impliquant l’introduction d’incitations financières (et l’adhésion automatique en Nouvelle-Zélande), ont été efficace à augmenter la couverture parmi les plus hauts niveaux au sein des dispositifs de retraites volontaires, mais des écarts de couverture demeurent et doivent être abordés.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Antolin & Stéphanie Payet & Juan Yermo, 2012. "Coverage of Private Pension Systems: Evidence and Policy Options," OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions 20, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:dafaad:20-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k94d6gh2w6c-en
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Munyambonera, Ezra & Katunze, Miriam & Munu, Martin Luther & Sserunjogi, Brian, 2018. "Expanding the Pension Sector in Uganda," Research Series 275661, Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    adhésion automatique; adéquation des prestations; auto-enrolment; benefit adequacy; coercition; compulsion; Couverture; coverage; financial incentives; funded pensions; incitations financières; retraite par capitalisation;

    JEL classification:

    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • J26 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Retirement; Retirement Policies
    • J32 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:dafaad:20-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/caoecfr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.