IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Power of tests for unit roots in the presence of a linear trend

Listed author(s):
  • Bent Nielsen


    (Nuffield College, University of Oxford)

Dickey and Fuller (1981) suggested unit root tests for an autoregressive model with a linear trend and a fixed initial value. This model has nuisance parameters so later authors have often worked with a slightly different model with a random initial value in which nuisance parameters can be eliminated by an invariant reduction of the model. This facilitates computation of envelope power functions and comparison of the relative performance of different unit root tests. It is shown here that invariance arguments also can be used when comparing power within the model with fixed initial value. Despite the apparently small difference between the two models the relative performance of unit root tests turns out to be very different.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford in its series Economics Papers with number 2003-W22.

in new window

Length: 24 pages
Date of creation: 15 Nov 2003
Handle: RePEc:nuf:econwp:0322
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nuf:econwp:0322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Maxine Collett)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.