IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/npf/wpaper/17-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Resource requirements for Right to Education (RTE): Normative and the Real

Author

Listed:
  • Bose, Sukanya

    (National Institute of Public Finance and Policy)

  • Ghosh, Priyanta

    (National Institute of Public Finance and Policy)

  • Sardana, Arvind

    (Eklavya, Madhya Pradesh)

Abstract

The paper examines the issue of resource adequacy for Right to Education (RTE) by estimating the resource requirement for universalization of elementary education across twelve Indian States. Using RTE norms as the base, a framework for estimating school and system level resource requirements is laid down. Apart from the official norms, framing of the normative must necessarily take into account the present structure of schools including the pattern of enrolment in government schools vis-à-vis private schools, existing infrastruc-ture in these schools, school size etc. Database of school-level information has been used for the purpose. Actual budgetary expenditure presents the distance from the normative. The results indicate that even with minimal norms, there is a vast amount of under-spending per student by governments. Except in the case of Tamil Nadu, the required ex-penditure per student is short of the normative requirement. In States like Bihar, Jharkhand, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh, not only is the requirement many times the present levels of expenditure, the burden of additional requirement falls disproportionately on these poorer States. The present set of policy interventions and inter-governmental resource sharing ar-rangements fail to adequately address the specific resource needs of these States for fulfilling the basic entitlement.

Suggested Citation

  • Bose, Sukanya & Ghosh, Priyanta & Sardana, Arvind, 2017. "Resource requirements for Right to Education (RTE): Normative and the Real," Working Papers 17/201, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
  • Handle: RePEc:npf:wpaper:17/201
    Note: Working Paper 201, 2017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nipfp.org.in/media/medialibrary/2017/07/WP_2017_201.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pinaki Chakraborty & Bharatee Bhusana Dash, 2017. "Fiscal Reforms, Fiscal Rule, and Development Spending: How Indian States Have Performed?," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 111-133, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiwari, Atul Kumar & Ghei, Dhananjay & Goel, Prerna, 2017. "Social Security Agreements (SSAs) in practice: Evidence from India's SSAs wih countries in Europe," Working Papers 17/203, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    2. Bhabesh Hazarika & Pratap Ranjan Jena, 2017. "Public Procurement in India: Assessment of Institutional Mechanism, Challenges, and Reforms," Working Papers id:12004, eSocialSciences.
    3. Atul Tiwari & Dhananjay Ghei & Prerna Goel, 2017. "Social Security Agreements (SSAs) in practice: Evidence from India’s SSA with countries in Europe," Working Papers id:12005, eSocialSciences.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Stephen Ferris & Bharatee Bhusana Dash, 2019. "Expenditure visibility and voter memory: a compositional approach to the political budget cycle in Indian states, 1959–2012," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 129-157, June.
    2. Stanley L. Winer & J. Stephen Ferris & Bharatee Bhusana Dash & Pinaki Chakraborty, 2021. "Political competitiveness and the private–public structure of public expenditure: a model and empirics for the Indian States," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 28(6), pages 1430-1471, December.
    3. Sowmya Dhanaraj & Vidya Mahambare & Pragati, 2021. "Are India’s farm debt waivers a political tool that impacts government finances?," Working Papers 2021-211, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    4. Pinaki Chakraborty, 2017. "Federalism, fiscal space, and public investment spending: do fiscal rules impose hard-budget constraints?," Chapters, in: Naoyuki Yoshino & Peter J. Morgan (ed.), Central and Local Government Relations in Asia, chapter 3, pages 103-129, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Raut, Dirghau & Raju, Swati, 2019. "Size of Expenditure Multipliers for Indian States: Does the Level of Income and Public Debt Matter?," MPRA Paper 104947, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Rahul Pathak, 2023. "Do Subnational Fiscal Rules Reduce Public Investment? The Case of Fiscal Responsibility Laws in India," Public Finance Review, , vol. 51(3), pages 315-338, May.
    7. Šagát Vladimír & Plaček Michal & Kolman Petr, 2019. "The Impact of Fiscal Rules on the Financial Management of Higher Self-Governing Units in the Slovak Republic," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 135-159, June.
    8. Behera, Deepak Kumar & Dash, Umakant, 2019. "Prioritization of government expenditure on health in India: A fiscal space perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. R. Mohan & N. Ramalingam & D. Shyjan, 2014. "Horizontal Devolution of States in India-Suggestions Before the Fourteenth Finance Commission," Working Papers id:5965, eSocialSciences.
    10. Mahambare, Vidya & Dhanaraj, Sowmya & Mittal, Pragati, 2022. "The political budget cycles in the presence of a fiscal rule: The case of farm debt waivers in India," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 701-721.
    11. Bharatee Bhusana Dash & J. Stephen Ferris, 2018. "Economic Performance and Electoral Volatility: Testing the Economic Voting Hypothesis on Indian States, 1957–2013," Carleton Economic Papers 18-07, Carleton University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Right to Education ; universalization ; expenditure ; resource requirement ; adequacy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid
    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:npf:wpaper:17/201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: S.Siva Chidambaram (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nipfp.org.in .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.