IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/32342.html

The Limited Effects of U.S. Protests

Author

Listed:
  • Amory Gethin
  • Vincent Pons

Abstract

We provide systematic evidence on the effects of protests on public opinion, political behavior, and legislative policymaking. Drawing on a database covering the quasi-universe of protests held in the United States from 2017 to 2022, we identify 14 protest waves that covered topics related to environmental protection, gender equality, racial issues, gun control, immigration, and national and international politics. We use Twitter data, Google search volumes, high-frequency surveys, official election results, and data on politician behavior to track the evolution of online interest, policy views, vote intentions, and policies proposed and adopted before and after the onset of each protest wave. Combining national-level event studies with difference-in-differences designs that exploit variation in local protest intensity, we find that protests generate substantial internet activity but have minimal effects on other outcomes. The Black Lives Matter protests following George Floyd’s death are a notable exception. They increased both support for the Democratic Party and legislative activity on racial issues, suggesting that transgressive contention is more impactful than contained demonstrations. Finally, protests generally do not generate political backlash unless they become violent.

Suggested Citation

  • Amory Gethin & Vincent Pons, 2024. "The Limited Effects of U.S. Protests," NBER Working Papers 32342, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32342
    Note: POL
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w32342.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lilac Nachum & Stephan Manning & Sankar Sen, 2025. "Consumers as regulators of global value chains’ conduct? A consumer-inclusive framework of change," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 172-193, June.
    2. Sardoschau, Sulin & Casanueva-Artís, Annalí, 2025. "The Cost of Tolerating Intolerance: Right-Wing Protest and Hate Crimes," IZA Discussion Papers 17763, IZA Network @ LISER.
    3. Sulin Sardoschau & Annalí Casanueva Artís, 2025. "The Cost of Tolerating Intolerance: Right-Wing Protest and Hate Crimes," CESifo Working Paper Series 11745, CESifo.
    4. Cyprien Batut & Caroline Coly & Sarah Schneider-Strawczynski, 2026. "It’s a Man’s World: Culture of Abuse, #Metoo and Worker Flows," CESifo Working Paper Series 12551, CESifo.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • P0 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.