IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/30007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring the Valuation of Liquidity with Penalized Withdrawals

Author

Listed:
  • David Coyne
  • Itzik Fadlon
  • Tommaso Porzio

Abstract

We introduce penalized withdrawals from retirement savings accounts as a new revealed-preference tool to measure households' valuation of liquidity. This approach addresses key empirical challenges by providing a proxy for marginal utility without requiring assumptions on preferences or data on access to credit. Using U.S. administrative tax data from 1999-2018, we document three main findings. First, geographic differences, driven by local credit supply, account for over 30% of the nationwide variation in the valuation of liquidity across labor markets. Second, areas hit hardest by the Great Recession saw large increases in the valuation of liquidity, with local credit market spillovers explaining two-thirds of the effect. Third, Black households rely more heavily on penalized withdrawals, even after controlling for income and location, consistent with limited access to formal credit. Together, these findings highlight significant scope for welfare gains through more targeted safety-net policies and demonstrate the practical value of penalized withdrawals as a tool for monitoring liquidity needs.

Suggested Citation

  • David Coyne & Itzik Fadlon & Tommaso Porzio, 2022. "Measuring the Valuation of Liquidity with Penalized Withdrawals," NBER Working Papers 30007, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30007
    Note: AG EFG PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w30007.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leganza, Jonathan M., 2024. "The effect of required minimum distributions on intergenerational transfers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • D53 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Financial Markets
    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth
    • G51 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Household Savings, Borrowing, Debt, and Wealth
    • H0 - Public Economics - - General
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • J15 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
    • R1 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.