IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/28962.html

Impacts of the Clean Air Act on the Power Sector from 1938-1994: Anticipation and Adaptation

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Clay
  • Akshaya Jha
  • Joshua A. Lewis
  • Edson R. Severnini

Abstract

This paper provides the first assessment of the plant-level productivity impacts of the 1970 Clean Air Act (CAA) that accounts for anticipatory responses. A simple theoretical framework is used to illustrate how credible signals of future regulatory actions can induce firms to make anticipatory investments in cleaner technologies, mitigating the subsequent impacts of environmental regulation. Drawing on newly digitized data on virtually every fossil-fuel power plant in the United States from 1938-1994, the paper uses a difference-in-differences approach to examine the impacts of the Act's nonattainment designations on coal-fired power plants. We find that nonattainment designation led to a 20% reduction in productivity among plants built before 1963, but had no effect on plants built after the passage of the 1963 CAA. The 1963 CAA resulted in minimal regulatory enforcement but served as a strong signal of impending federal air pollution regulation. Empirical and historical evidence suggests that electric utilities made anticipatory investments following the passage of the 1963 CAA. As a result, plants that opened after 1963 were better able to adapt to subsequent regulatory enforcement under the 1970 CAA. The aggregate productivity losses from the 1970 CAA were also substantially mitigated by the reallocation of output away from older, less productive power plants. These productivity losses would be substantially underestimated without utilizing data that extends well before the 1970 CAA.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Clay & Akshaya Jha & Joshua A. Lewis & Edson R. Severnini, 2021. "Impacts of the Clean Air Act on the Power Sector from 1938-1994: Anticipation and Adaptation," NBER Working Papers 28962, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28962
    Note: DAE EEE LE PE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w28962.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan T. Hawkins-Pierot & Katherine R. H. Wagner, 2022. "Technology Lock-In and Optimal Carbon Pricing," CESifo Working Paper Series 9762, CESifo.
    2. Yuan, Huaxi & Zou, Longhui & Feng, Yidai, 2023. "How to achieve emission reduction without hindering economic growth? The role of judicial quality," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Jonathan T. Hawkins-Pierot & Katherine R. H. Wagner, 2023. "Technology Lock-In and Costs of Delayed Climate Policy," Working Papers 23-33, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • N52 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - U.S.; Canada: 1913-
    • N72 - Economic History - - Economic History: Transport, International and Domestic Trade, Energy, and Other Services - - - U.S.; Canada: 1913-
    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.