IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/28791.html

Life Satisfaction and Body Mass Index: Estimating the Monetary Value of Achieving Optimal Body Weight

Author

Listed:
  • Kristjana Baldursdottir
  • Paul McNamee
  • Edward C. Norton
  • Tinna Laufey Asgeirsdóttir

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization, obesity is one of the greatest public-health challenges of the 21st century. Body weight is also known to affect individuals’ self-esteem and interpersonal relationships, including romantic ones. We estimate “utility-maximizing” Body Mass Index (BMI) and calculate the implied monetary value of changes in both individual and spousal BMI, using the compensating income variation method and data from the Swiss Household Panel. Two-stage least squares models are estimated for women and men separately, with mother’s education as an instrument to account for the potential endogeneity in income. Results suggest that the optimal own BMI is 27.4 and 22.7 for men and women, respectively. The annual value of reaching optimal weight ranges from $3,235 for underweight women to $32,378 for obese women and from $19,088 for underweight men to $43,175 for obese men. Women on average value changes in their own BMI about three times higher than changes in their spouse’s BMI. Men, on the other hand, value a reduction in their spouse’s BMI almost twice as much compared to a reduction in their own BMI.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristjana Baldursdottir & Paul McNamee & Edward C. Norton & Tinna Laufey Asgeirsdóttir, 2021. "Life Satisfaction and Body Mass Index: Estimating the Monetary Value of Achieving Optimal Body Weight," NBER Working Papers 28791, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28791
    Note: EH
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w28791.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tinna Laufey Ásgeirsdóttir & Arnar Buason & Ásthildur Margrét Jóhannsdóttir, 2023. "Valuing the Wellbeing Associated with Psychosocial Factors at Work," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1737-1759, August.
    2. Tinna Laufey Ásgeirsdóttir & Gísli Gylfason & Arna Hauksdóttir & Edda Bjork Thordardottir & Unnur Anna Valdimarsdóttir, 2023. "Monetizing Utility Reductions Associated with Bullying," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 2395-2439, December.
    3. Ásgeirsdóttir, Tinna Laufey & Hardardottir, Hjördis & Jonbjarnardóttir, Brynja, 2023. "Putting a price on pain: The monetary compensation needed to offset welfare losses due to violence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    4. Hoai Nam Dang Vu & Tinna Laufey Ásgeirsdóttir, 2025. "Estimating the Cost of Crime Victimization: A Compensating Income Variation Approach Using Different Utility Proxies," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 649-667, January.
    5. Baldursdottir, Kristjana & Asgeirsdottir, Tinna Laufey & Olafsdottir, Thorhildur, 2023. "How sensitive is the compensating income variation to severity and adaptation?," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I14 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Inequality
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.