IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/27969.html

Millionaires Speak: What Drives Their Personal Investment Decisions?

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana Bender
  • James J. Choi
  • Danielle Dyson
  • Adriana Z. Robertson

Abstract

We survey 2,484 U.S. individuals with at least $1 million of investable assets about how well leading academic theories describe their financial beliefs and personal investment decisions. The wealthy’s beliefs about financial markets and the economy are surprisingly similar to those of the average U.S. household, but the wealthy are less driven by discomfort with the market, financial constraints, and labor income considerations. Portfolio equity share is most affected by professional advice, time until retirement, personal experiences, rare disaster risk, and health risk. Concentrated equity holding is most often motivated by belief that the stock has superior risk-adjusted returns. Beliefs about how expected returns vary with stock characteristics frequently differ from historical relationships, and more risk is not always associated with higher expected returns. Active equity fund investment is most motivated by professional advice and the expectation of higher average returns. Berk and Green (2004) rationalize return chasing in the absence of fund performance persistence by positing that past returns reveal managerial skill but there are diminishing returns to scale in active management. Forty-two percent of respondents agree with the first assumption, 33% with the second, and 19% with both.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana Bender & James J. Choi & Danielle Dyson & Adriana Z. Robertson, 2020. "Millionaires Speak: What Drives Their Personal Investment Decisions?," NBER Working Papers 27969, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27969
    Note: AP
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w27969.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dmitrii Gimmelberg & Alexey Belinskiy & Alexey Belinskiy & Marta Głowacka & Marta Głowacka & Sergei Korotkii & Valentin Artamonov & Iveta Ludviga, 2025. "Market moves predictions using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) analysis of capital market expert opinions in social media," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 13(1), pages 175-188, September.
    2. Kaustia, Markku & Conlin, Andrew & Luotonen, Niilo, 2023. "What drives stock market participation? The role of institutional, traditional, and behavioral factors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Andries, Marianne & Bianchi, Milo & Huynh, Karen & Pouget, Sebastien, 2024. "Return Predictability, Expectations, and Investment: Experimental Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 19239, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Kim, Amee & Vanheusden, Frederique J. & Rashid, Mamunur, 2025. "Factors affecting UK household financial risk-taking and their implications for consumption of financial investments," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Ingar Haaland & Ole-Andreas Elvik Næss & Ingar K. Haaland, 2023. "Misperceived Returns to Active Investing," CESifo Working Paper Series 10257, CESifo.
    6. Peter Andre & Philipp Schirmer & Johannes Wohlfart, 2023. "Mental Models of the Stock Market," CESifo Working Paper Series 10691, CESifo.
    7. Hervé, Fabrice & Marsat, Sylvain, 2024. "Like daughter, like father: Female socialization and green equity investment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    8. Jonathan Huntley & Valentina Michelangeli & Felix Reichling, 2021. "What drives investors to chase returns?," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1334, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    9. Baeckström, Ylva & Hauff, Jeanette Carlsson, 2024. "Wealth transfer intentions, family decision-making style and sustainable investing: The case of millionaires," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    10. Yang, Jing & Shi, Jianxun & Xu, Ling, 2025. "Effect of digital finance on household financial asset allocation: a social psychology perspective," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G50 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.