IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v13y2025i1p175-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market moves predictions using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) analysis of capital market expert opinions in social media

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitrii Gimmelberg

    (RISEBA University of Applied Sciences, Latvia)

  • Alexey Belinskiy

    (RISEBA University of Applied Sciences, Latvia)

  • Alexey Belinskiy

    (Aestima Research, SIA, Latvia)

  • Marta Głowacka

    (Aestima Research, SIA, Latvia)

  • Marta Głowacka

    (SBS Swiss Business School, Switzerland)

  • Sergei Korotkii

    (Aestima Research, SIA, Latvia)

  • Valentin Artamonov

    (Aestima Research, SIA, Latvia)

  • Iveta Ludviga

    (Aestima Research, SIA, Latvia)

Abstract

This study explores the predictive value of expert opinions from financial market media using Artificial Intelligence (AI), specifically, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework integrated with a Large Language Model (LLM). By analysing 3,877 YouTube videos spanning 12 months, the research categorised 4,808 expert opinions—either explicit or inferred—into directional market predictions (up, down, flat) for seven diversified financial assets. Results indicate that aggregated expert opinions correlate significantly with short-term market movements but lose predictive power for longer horizons. Explicit opinions demonstrated similar accuracy to inferred judgments, suggesting that LLMs effectively extract latent insights from unstructured data, enhancing accessibility and utility for retail investors. The study highlights the democratising potential of LLMs, providing timely and scalable analysis of vast datasets. However, challenges remain, such as understanding domain-specific nuances and speaker attribution within multimedia content. Statistical analysis reveals that expert opinions, particularly when aggregated, identify exploitable inefficiencies, thereby challenging the Efficient Market Hypothesis's assumption of perfect information dissemination. Short-term market anomalies observed align with behavioural finance theories of cognitive bias and delayed information diffusion. By bridging qualitative sentiment with quantitative modelling, this research underscores the transformative role of AI-driven tools in financial analysis, offering new avenues for individual and institutional investors. Further development of LLMs tailored to domain-specific complexities may revolutionise investment practices and advance research on market behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitrii Gimmelberg & Alexey Belinskiy & Alexey Belinskiy & Marta Głowacka & Marta Głowacka & Sergei Korotkii & Valentin Artamonov & Iveta Ludviga, 2025. "Market moves predictions using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) analysis of capital market expert opinions in social media," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 13(1), pages 175-188, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:175-188
    DOI: 10.9770/w9365778559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/49/Gimmelberg_Market_moves_predictions_using_RetrievalAugmented_Generation_RAG_analysis_of_capital_market_expert_opinions_in_social_media.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/1337
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/w9365778559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:175-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.