Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis: Power versus Frequency of Observation
Power functions of tests of the random walk hypothesis versus stationary first order autoregressive alternatives are tabulated for samples of fixed span but various frequencies of observation.
|Date of creation:||Apr 1985|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||published as Perron, Pierre and Robert J. Shiller. "Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis: Power Versus Frequency of Observation," Economic Letters, Vol. 18, 1985,pp. 381-386.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.|
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberte:0045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.