Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis: Power Versus Frequency of Observation
Power functions of tests of the random walk hypothesis versus stationary first order autoregressive alternatives are tabulated for samples of fixed span but various frequencies of observation. For a t-test and normalized test, power is found to depend, for a substantial range of parameter values, more on the span of the data in time than on the number of observations. For a runs test, power rapidly declines as the number of observations is increased beyond a certain point.
|Date of creation:||Dec 1984|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in Economics Letters (1985), 18: 381-386|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Yale University, Box 208281, New Haven, CT 06520-8281 USA|
Phone: (203) 432-3702
Fax: (203) 432-6167
Web page: http://cowles.yale.edu/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Postal: Cowles Foundation, Yale University, Box 208281, New Haven, CT 06520-8281 USA|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Matthew C. Regan)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.