IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberhi/0102.html

Sears Roebuck in the Twentieth Century: Competition, Complementarities, and the Problem of Wasting Assets

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Raff
  • Peter Temin

Abstract

Sears Roebuck and Co. faced similar challenges in the 1920s and the 1980s. On the strength of the early period's strategic investment decisions, the company grew into the nation's largest retailer and a pervasive factor in the economy. In the later period, unanswered challenges nearly destroyed the company. We analyze the elements that contributed to the success in the 1920s and to the near disaster in the 1980s and place them in a broader and more systematic context. We argue that successful innovations combine a focus on an attractive market with an exploitation and even enhancement of a firm's existing competitive strengths.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Raff & Peter Temin, 1997. "Sears Roebuck in the Twentieth Century: Competition, Complementarities, and the Problem of Wasting Assets," NBER Historical Working Papers 0102, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberhi:0102
    Note: DAE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/h0102.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steve Wood, 2009. "Organisational rigidities and marketing theory: examining the US department store c.1910--1965," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 747-770, April.
    2. Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo & Buckley, Tom, 2021. "Early “Frictions” in the Transition towards Cashless Payments," MPRA Paper 108834, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Emek Basker & Shawn Klimek & Pham Hoang Van, 2012. "Supersize It: The Growth of Retail Chains and the Rise of the “Big‐Box” Store," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 541-582, September.
    4. L Hannah, 1997. "Marshalls Trees and the Global Forest: Were Giant Redwoods Different?," CEP Discussion Papers dp0318, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    5. Hannah, L., 1997. "Marshall's 'trees' and the global 'forest': were 'giant redwoods different?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20363, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberhi:0102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.