IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mse/cesdoc/16034r.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Capturing the intrinsic uncertainty of the VaR: Spectrum representation of a saddlepoint approximation for an estimator of the VaR

Author

Abstract

Though risk measurement is the core of most regulatory document, in both financial and insurance industries, risk managers and regulators pay little attention to the random behaviour of risk measures. To address this uncertainty, we provide a novel way to build a robust parametric confidence interval (CI) of Value-at-Risk (VaR) for different lengths of samples. We compute this CI from a saddlepoint approximation of the distribution of an estimator of VaR. Based on the CI, we create a spectrum representation that represents an area that we use to define a risk measure. We apply this methodology to risk management and stress testing providing an indicator of threats caused by events uncaptured in the traditional VaR methodology which can lead to dramatic failures

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani & Kehan Li, 2016. "Capturing the intrinsic uncertainty of the VaR: Spectrum representation of a saddlepoint approximation for an estimator of the VaR," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16034r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Jul 2016.
  • Handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:16034r
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominique Gu�gan & Bertrand Hassani & Kehan Li, 2015. "The Spectral Stress VaR (SSVaR)," Working Papers 2015:17, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    2. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani & Kehan Li, 2015. "The Spectral Stress VaR (SSVaR)," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01169537, HAL.
    3. Kaplan, David M., 2015. "Improved quantile inference via fixed-smoothing asymptotics and Edgeworth expansion," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 20-32.
    4. Matthew Pritsker, 1997. "Evaluating Value at Risk Methodologies: Accuracy versus Computational Time," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 12(2), pages 201-242, October.
    5. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani & Kehan Li, 2015. "The Spectral Stress VaR (SSVaR)," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 15052, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    6. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani & Kehan Li, 2015. "The Spectral Stress VaR (SSVaR)," Post-Print halshs-01169537, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand Hassani & Kehan Li, 2017. "Measuring risks in the extreme tail: The extreme VaR and its confidence interval," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01317391, HAL.
    2. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani & Kehan Li, 2016. "A robust confidence interval of historical Value-at-Risk for small sample," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16034, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    3. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani & Kehan Li, 2016. "Uncertainty in historical Value-at-Risk: an alternative quantile-based risk measure," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16006, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    4. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani & Kehan Li, 2016. "Uncertainty in historical Value-at-Risk: an alternative quantile-based risk measure," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01277880, HAL.
    5. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani & Kehan Li, 2016. "Uncertainty in historical Value-at-Risk: an alternative quantile-based risk measure," Post-Print halshs-01277880, HAL.
    6. Laurent El Ghaoui & Maksim Oks & Francois Oustry, 2003. "Worst-Case Value-At-Risk and Robust Portfolio Optimization: A Conic Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 543-556, August.
    7. Mínguez, R. & Conejo, A.J. & García-Bertrand, R., 2011. "Reliability and decomposition techniques to solve certain class of stochastic programming problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 314-323.
    8. Rockstuhl, Sebastian & Wenninger, Simon & Wiethe, Christian & Ahlrichs, Jakob, 2022. "The influence of risk perception on energy efficiency investments: Evidence from a German survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Matthew Pritsker, 2001. "The hidden dangers of historical simulation," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2001-27, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    10. Goldman, Matt & Kaplan, David M., 2017. "Fractional order statistic approximation for nonparametric conditional quantile inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 331-346.
    11. Jose A. Lopez, 1999. "Methods for evaluating value-at-risk estimates," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pages 3-17.
    12. Silvia Stanescu & Radu Tunaru, 2013. "Quantifying the uncertainty in VaR and expected shortfall estimates," Chapters, in: Adrian R. Bell & Chris Brooks & Marcel Prokopczuk (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Finance, chapter 15, pages 357-372, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. John Cotter & Kevin Dowd, 2010. "Estimating financial risk measures for futures positions: A nonparametric approach," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(7), pages 689-703, July.
    14. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Fabrice Barthélémy, 2018. "Ex-ante real estate Value at Risk calculation method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(2), pages 257-285, March.
    15. Traian A. Pirvu & Gordan Zitkovic, 2007. "Maximizing the Growth Rate under Risk Constraints," Papers 0706.0480, arXiv.org.
    16. Chrétien, Stéphane & Coggins, Frank, 2010. "Performance and conservatism of monthly FHS VaR: An international investigation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 323-333, December.
    17. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    18. Matt Goldman & David M. Kaplan, 2018. "Non‐parametric inference on (conditional) quantile differences and interquantile ranges, using L‐statistics," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(2), pages 136-169, June.
    19. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Fabrice Barthélémy, 2022. "Proper use of the modified Sharpe ratios in performance measurement: rearranging the Cornish Fisher expansion," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 691-712, June.
    20. Manuel Kleinknecht & Wing Lon Ng, 2015. "Minimizing Basel III Capital Requirements with Unconditional Coverage Constraint," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(4), pages 263-281, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial regulation; Value-at-Risk; Order statistic; Uncertainty; Saddlepoint approximation; Stress testing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:16034r. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucie Label (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cenp1fr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.