IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Finanzkrise und Reformbedarf [The Financial Crisis and Regulatory Reform]

Listed author(s):
  • Martin Hellwig


    (Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn)

The report provides an analysis of the financial crisis of 2007/2008 and draws some conclusions about the need for regulatory reform. The analysis ascribes the crisis not only to problems in subprime mortgage lending and securitization, but also to excessive maturity transformation and overindebtedness of financial institutions and to flaws in financial system architecture. Because of these flaws, the initial shocks of August 2007 induced a self-supporting downward spiral in financial markets and financial institutions, which only ended in October 2008 when taxpayers were forced to provide guarantees for financial institutions. The first part of the paper provides an in-depth analysis of developments in subprime mortgage lending and securitization, focusing on problems of security design and governance, and lack of external discipline from rating agencies or investors. The second part discusses maturity transformation and excessive indebtedness and their implications for the fragility of individual institutions as well as the system as a whole. Systemic fragility is seen as a result of the interplay of price declines in malfunctioning markets, fair value accounting, an insufficiency of bank equity, and regulation induced or market induced deleveraging, putting further pressure on markets and prices. The third part of the paper goes through the different causes of adverse developments, with a distinction between individual misbehavior and systemic flaws. Among systemic flaws, the paper discusses governance problems in mortgage origination and securitization as well as banking and shortcomings of regulation, in particular, capital regulation under the model-based approach. Reform proposals concern capital regulation, liability and remuneration of bank management, procedures for dealing with banks in difficulties, and insolvency law. The latter two subjects are introduced in order to reduce the scope for submitting government to blackmail by banks in difficulties.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods in its series Working Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods with number 2010_19.

in new window

Date of creation: May 2010
Handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2010_19
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 10 - D- 53113 Bonn

Phone: +49-(0)228 / 91416-0
Fax: +49-(0)228 / 91416-55
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2010_19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marc Martin)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.