IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc94633.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Report on case studies of the technology-based services for independent living for older people

Author

Abstract

This report elaborates five case studies of good practices of technology-enabled services for independent living of older adults at home from the 14 obtained in the deliverable 1 of the ICT-AGE project. The aim is to obtain policy lessons studying a group of variables related with the creation and implementation of these services by public long-term care systems, such as business case and models, training actions, scaling and market creation, evaluation process and organisation change, among others. A case study is provided per each good practice on the basis of the variables analysed.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Carretero & Csaba Kucsera, 2015. "Report on case studies of the technology-based services for independent living for older people," JRC Working Papers JRC94633, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc94633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC94633
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ramon Sabes-Figuera, 2015. "Title: Strategic Intelligence Monitor on Personal Health Systems Phase 3 (SIMPHS 3) – ACTION (Sweden) Case Study Report," JRC Working Papers JRC94500, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    long-term care; social investment; social return; information and communication technologies; active and healthy ageing; quality of care; productivity; carers; financial sustainability; care; savings; ageing in place; social innovation;

    JEL classification:

    • I00 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - General - - - General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc94633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Publication Officer). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.