IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc77754.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

ERAWATCH country reports 2011: LATVIA

Author

Listed:
  • Anda Adamsone Fiskovica

    (Latvian Academy of Sciences (Riga, Latvia))

  • Anita Draveniece
  • Janis Kristapsons

Abstract

The main objective of the ERAWATCH Annual Country Reports is to characterise and assess the performance of national research systems and related policies in a structured manner that is comparable across countries. The 2011 country reports assess the evolution on the national R&D investments targets, the efficiency and effectiveness of national policies and investments into R&D, the articulation between education, research and innovation, with an increased focus on the last two in terms of their wider governance and policy mix. The reports for EU MS and AS integrates in the assessment the evolution of the national policy mixes in the perspective of the Europe 2020 Strategy goals and on the realisation and better governance of ERA .

Suggested Citation

  • Anda Adamsone Fiskovica & Anita Draveniece & Janis Kristapsons, 2012. "ERAWATCH country reports 2011: LATVIA," JRC Research Reports JRC77754, Joint Research Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc77754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC77754
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Slavo Radosevic & Anna Kaderabkova (ed.), 2011. "Challenges for European Innovation Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14060.
    2. Slavo Radosevic, 2011. "Challenges of Converging Innovation Policies in a Multi-Tier Europe: A Neo-Schumpeterian Perspective," Chapters, in: Slavo Radosevic & Anna Kaderabkova (ed.), Challenges for European Innovation Policy, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Anda Adamsone-Fiskovica & Janis Kristapsons & Aija Lulle, 2009. "ERAWATCH Country Reports 2009: Latvia - Analysis of Policy Mixes to Foster R&D Investment and to Contribute to the ERA," JRC Research Reports JRC53707, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaan Masso & Amaresh K Tiwari, 2021. "Productivity Implications Of R&D, Innovation And Capital Accumulation For Incumbents And Entrants: The Case Of Estonia," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 130, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    2. Hölzl, Werner & Janger, Jürgen, 2013. "Does the analysis of innovation barriers perceived by high growth firms provide information on innovation policy priorities?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1450-1468.
    3. Slavo Radosevic & Esin Yoruk, 2016. "A New Metrics Of Technology Upgrading: The Central And East European Countries In A Comparative Perspective," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 2016-2, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    4. Anna Kaderabkova & Slavo Radosevic, 2011. "Innovation Policy in Multi-Tier Europe: Introduction," Chapters, in: Slavo Radosevic & Anna Kaderabkova (ed.), Challenges for European Innovation Policy, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Slagjana Stojanovska & Violeta Madzova & Biljana Gjozinska, 2018. "Why the Concept of Private Demand for Innovations Should Be Understand: The case of ex-YU countries," Journal of Innovative Business and Management, DOBA Faculty, vol. 10(2).
    6. Randolph Luca Bruno & Elodie Douarin & Julia Korosteleva & Slavo Radosevic, 2019. "Determinants of Productivity Gap in the European Union: A Multilevel Perspective," LEM Papers Series 2019/25, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    7. Margit Kirs & Veiko Lember & Erkki Karo, 2021. "Technology transfer in economic periphery: Emerging patterns and policy challenges," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(6), pages 677-706, November.
    8. Jürgen Janger, 2012. "Strukturwandel und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit in der EU," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 85(8), pages 625-640, August.
    9. Slavo Radosevic & Esin Yoruk, 2012. "SAPPHO Revisited: Factors of Innovation Success in Knowledge-Intensive Enterprises in Central and Eastern Europe," DRUID Working Papers 12-11, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    10. Szalavetz Andrea, 2014. "Innovation in Hungary - The Impact of EU Accession and Integration into Global Value Chains," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 42(1), pages 40-59, June.
    11. Zhelyu Vladimirov, 2018. "Discussing Innovation Policy Biases in the New EU Member States," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 3-26.
    12. Tihana Škrinjarić, 2020. "R&D in Europe: Sector Decomposition of Sources of (in)Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Werner Hölzl & Jürgen Janger, 2012. "Innovation Barriers across Firms and Countries," WIFO Working Papers 426, WIFO.
    14. Cristina Serbanica, 2018. "Smart Specialization and Sustainability in Central and Eastern Europe: An Inquiry Into The Logic of Intervention," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 12(1), pages 43-58, June.
    15. Magdolna Sass & Andrea Szalavetz, 2014. "R&D-based integration and upgrading in Hungary," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 64(supplemen), pages 153-180, November.
    16. Cristina Serbanica, 2018. "Smart Specialization and Sustainability in Central and Eastern Europe: An Inquiry Into The Logic of Intervention," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 12(1), pages 43-58, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc77754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.