IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/inq/inqwps/ecineq2006-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On longitudinal analysis of poverty conceptualised as a fuzzy state

Author

Listed:
  • Gianni Betti

    () (Università di Siena)

  • Bruno Cheli

    () (Università di Pisa)

  • Vijay Verma

    () (Università di Siena)

Abstract

When poverty is viewed as a matter of degree, i.e. as a fuzzy measure, two additional aspects are introduced into the analysis compared with the conventional poor/non-poor dichotomous approach: (i) the choice of membership functions i.e. quantitative specification of individuals' or households' degrees of poverty and deprivation; and (ii) the choice of rules for the manipulation of the resulting fuzzy sets, rules defining their complements, intersections, union and averaging. Specifically, for longitudinal analysis of poverty using the fuzzy set approach, we need joint membership functions covering more than one time period, which have to be constructed on the basis of the series of cross-sectional membership functions over those time periods. In this paper we propose a general rule for the construction of fuzzy set intersections, that is, rules for the construction of longitudinal poverty measures from a sequence of cross-sectional measures. On the basis of the results obtained, various fuzzy poverty measures over time can be constructed as consistent generalisations of the corresponding conventional (dichotomous) measures. Examples are rates of any-time, persistent and continuous poverty, distribution of persons and poverty spells according to duration, rates of exit and re-entry into the state of poverty, etc. The proposed rule has been developed in a logical, step-by-step, manner, satisfying the required marginal constraints. This is important since there are reasons to believe that, hitherto, the rules of fuzzy set operations in the context of multi-dimensional and longitudinal poverty analysis have not been well or widely understood. In an annex to this paper, we also present some numerical illustrations using survey data from the Italian European Community Household Panel, 1994-2001, with breakdown by Macro-region in Italy. The main objective, however, is to provide quantitative comparison between the conventional and fuzzy approaches. Noteworthy from a methodological point is the difference in the performance of the approaches concerning persistence of poverty. Movements in and out of poverty may be somewhat over-estimated (and hence the persistent or continuous poverty rates under-estimated) with the conventional approach, perhaps because it gives too much weight even to small movements across the poverty line.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianni Betti & Bruno Cheli & Vijay Verma, 2006. "On longitudinal analysis of poverty conceptualised as a fuzzy state," Working Papers 32, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
  • Handle: RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2006-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2006-32.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianni Betti & Bruno Cheli & Riccardo Cambini, 2004. "A statistical model for the dynamics between two fuzzy states: theory and an application to poverty analysis," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(3), pages 391-411.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Belhadj BESMA, 2010. "One-dimensional Fuzzy Poverty Measure from an Bootstrap Method Perspective," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 24, pages 110-125, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2006-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Maria Ana Lugo). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ecineea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.