IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb14-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Going Beyond Economic Engagement: Why South Korea Should Press the North on Labor Standards and Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Marcus Noland

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

In recent years, South Korea has been a major investor in North Korea, and South Korean firms have employed more than 50,000 North Korean workers. The hope has been to use economic engagement to lessen the North's direct state control over the economy and to encourage greater internal opening. This transformational vision however rests on unexamined assumptions about the impact of employment on North Korean behavior. New results from a groundbreaking survey of South Korean employers indicate that the North Korean government has limited its citizens' exposure both to South Koreans and to market-oriented economic practices. South Korean investment in North Korea may benefit the firms and workers involved, but evidence of broader spillovers is lacking. A South Korean campaign organized around workers' rights would complement economic engagement to increase the positive spillovers from South Korean employers in the North.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus Noland, 2014. "Going Beyond Economic Engagement: Why South Korea Should Press the North on Labor Standards and Practices," Policy Briefs PB14-12, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb14-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/going-beyond-economic-engagement-why-south-korea-should-press-north-labor
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haggard, Stephan & Lee, Jennifer & Noland, Marcus, 2012. "Integration in the absence of institutions: China–North Korea cross-border exchange," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 130-145.
    2. Stephan Haggard & Marcus Noland, 2018. "Networks, Trust and Trade: The Microeconomics of China–North Korea Integration," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 32(3), pages 277-299, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephan Haggard & Marcus Noland, 2012. "The Microeconomics of North--South Korean Cross-border Integration," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 407-430, September.
    2. Marcus Noland, 2019. "North Korea: Sanctions, Engagement and Strategic Reorientation," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 14(2), pages 189-209, July.
    3. Haggard, Stephan & Noland, Marcus, 2013. "Gender in Transition: The Case of North Korea," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 51-66.
    4. Haggard, Stephan & Noland, Marcus, 2016. "Hard Target: Sanctions, Inducements, and the Case of North Korea," MPRA Paper 105812, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Stephan Haggard & Marcus Noland, 2018. "Networks, Trust and Trade: The Microeconomics of China–North Korea Integration," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 32(3), pages 277-299, September.
    6. Justin V Hastings & Sarah G Phillips & David Ubilava & Andrey Vasnev, 2022. "Price Transmission in Conflict-Affected States: Evidence from Cereal Markets of Somalia," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 31(3), pages 272-291.
    7. Jong‐Wha Lee & Warwick McKibbin & Marcus Noland, 2018. "Prospects and Economic Impacts of Korean Unification: An Introduction," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 32(3), pages 221-225, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb14-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.