IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

This Far and No Farther? Nudging Agricultural Reform Forward

Listed author(s):
  • Tim Josling

    (Stanford University)

  • Dale E. Hathaway

    (National Center For Food and Agricultural Policy)

Registered author(s):

    As countries attempt to restart the stalled Doha Round and continue the negotiations on further agricultural trade reform International Economics Policy Briefs March 2004 Number PB04-1 and liberalization, it is useful to take stock of the progress made so far in the light of both the objectives of countries and the needs of the trading system. This policy brief reviews the main objectives of the agricultural talks in the World Trade Organization (WTO), examines the major proposals that emerged in the run-up to Cancún and at the ministerial itself, describes the emerging framework for further reform, and suggests ways in which the negotiations can build on this progress to achieve a worthwhile outcome.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Peterson Institute for International Economics in its series Policy Briefs with number PB04-01.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Mar 2004
    Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb04-01
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    1750 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036-1903

    Phone: 202-328-9000
    Fax: 202-659-3225
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb04-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peterson Institute webmaster)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.