IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/cpaper/01-wp269.html

Optimal Antibiotic Usage with Resistance and Endogenous Technological Change

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Secchi
  • Bruce A. Babcock

Abstract

The use of antibiotics poses an impure public goods problem. Their utilization jointly generates a (positive) private characteristic, that is, the health of the individual who consumes the drug, and a (negative) public characteristic, that is, the reduction in susceptibility that renders the drug less effective over time. The authors use an expected utility model to explicitly identify these characteristics in a dynamic setting from a social planner perspective. The trade-off between present and future use of a drug and the allocation of resources to the development of new drugs is discussed. Results suggest that the optimal policy would limit the number of people treated with an existing antibiotic through time. Also, the model indicates that short bursts of high-level investment in research and development are optimal when the research process is certain, while a steady increase in investment over time is warranted when the discovery process is uncertain.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Secchi & Bruce A. Babcock, 2001. "Optimal Antibiotic Usage with Resistance and Endogenous Technological Change," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 01-wp269, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:01-wp269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/01wp269.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=323
    File Function: Online Synopsis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Gardner & Layton, David F., 1996. "Resistance economics: social cost and the evolution of antibiotic resistance," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 349-355, July.
    2. R. Davison, 1978. "Optimal Depletion of an Exhaustible Resource with Research and Development towards an Alternative Technology," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 45(2), pages 355-367.
    3. Kingston, William, 2000. "Antibiotics, invention and innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 679-710, June.
    4. Tisdell, Clem, 1982. "Exploitation of Techniques That Decline in Effectiveness with Use," Public Finance = Finances publiques, , vol. 37(3), pages 428-437.
    5. William N. Evans & W. Kip Viscusi, 1991. "Utility-Based Measures of Health," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(5), pages 1422-1427.
    6. Goodin, Robert E., 1982. "Discounting Discounting," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 53-71, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:isu:genstf:2000010108000013359 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bokhari, Farasat A.S. & Mariuzzo, Franco & Yan, Weijie, 2024. "Antibacterial resistance and the cost of affecting demand: The case of UK antibiotics," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Herrmann, Markus & Gaudet, Gérard, 2009. "The economic dynamics of antibiotic efficacy under open access," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 334-350, May.
    4. Albert, Jason, 2021. "Strategic dynamics of antibiotic use and the evolution of antibiotic-resistant infections," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Rudholm, Niklas, 2002. "Economic implications of antibiotic resistance in a global economy," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1071-1083, November.
    6. Herrmann, Markus, 2010. "Monopoly pricing of an antibiotic subject to bacterial resistance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 137-150, January.
    7. Stéphane Mechoulan, 2007. "Market structure and communicable diseases," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 468-492, May.
    8. John B. Horowitz & H. Brian Moehring, 2004. "How property rights and patents affect antibiotic resistance," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(6), pages 575-583, June.
    9. Preston Greene, 2024. "Social bias, not time bias," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(1), pages 100-121, February.
    10. Farasat A.S. Bokhari & Franco Mariuzzo & Weijie Yan, 2019. "Antibacterial resistance and the cost of affecting demand: the case of UK antibiotics," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2019-03, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    11. Yves Arrighi & Fahariat Boukari & David Crainich, 2024. "Optimal combination of requirement and reward in financial incentive programs for weight loss," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 97(4), pages 685-706, December.
    12. Moreaux, Michel & Ricci, Francesco, 2005. "The simple analytics of developing resources from resources," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 41-63, January.
    13. Gardner Brown, 2000. "Renewable Natural Resource Management and Use Without Markets," Working Papers 0025, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
    14. Stocker Klaus, 2020. "Financial and Economic Assessment of Tidal Stream Energy—A Case Study," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Greenhalgh, S. & Samarasinghe, O. & Curran-Cournane, F. & Wright, W. & Brown, P., 2017. "Using ecosystem services to underpin cost–benefit analysis: Is it a way to protect finite soil resources?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 1-14.
    16. Roberto Mazzoleni & Hamza Virk, 2025. "Entry deterrence and antibiotic conservation under post-entry Bertrand competition," Papers 2512.05261, arXiv.org.
    17. Owens, Nicole N. & Swinton, Scott M. & Ravenswaay, Eileen O. van, 1995. "Farmer Demand for Safer Pesticides," Staff Paper Series 201201, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    18. Just, Richard E. & Netanyahu, Sinaia & Olson, Lars J., 2005. "Depletion of natural resources, technological uncertainty, and the adoption of technological substitutes," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 91-108, June.
    19. F. Barigozzi & B. Villeneuve, 2001. "Influencing the Misinformed Misbehaver: An Analysis of Public Policy towards Uncertainty and External Effects," Working Papers 404, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    20. Amigues, Jean-Pierre & Moreaux, Michel & Ricci, Francesco, 2008. "Resource-augmenting R&D with heterogeneous labor supply," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(6), pages 719-745, December.
    21. Kanjilal, Kiriti & Ahmed, Haseeb, 2021. "Transboundary regulation and management of antibiotics in livestock," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313889, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:cpaper:01-wp269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.